Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15186506›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2004

Tandem repeats analysis for the high resolution phylogenetic analysis of Yersinia pestis.

C Pourcel, F André-Mazeaud, H Neubauer, F Ramisse, G Vergnaud

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. New Genotype ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Phenotypic and Molecular Genetic Characteristics ofThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Strain discrimination ofChemical science · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. CRISPRs: molecular signatures used for pathogen subtyping.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2014
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C PourcelGénome, Polymorphisme et Minisatellites (GPMS), Institut de Génétique et Microbiologie, Bat, 400, UMR CNRS 8621, Université Paris XI, 91405 Orsay cedex, France. Gilles. christine.pourcel@igmors.u-psud.fr
F André-Mazeaud
H Neubauer
F Ramisse
G Vergnaud

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYersinia pestis, the agent of plague, is a young and highly monomorphic species. Three biovars, each one thought to be associated with the last three Y. pestis pandemics, have been defined based on biochemical assays. More recently, DNA based assays, including DNA sequencing, IS typing, DNA arrays, have significantly improved current knowledge on the origin and phylogenetic evolution of Y. pestis. However, these methods suffer either from a lack of resolution or from the difficulty to compare data. Variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs) provides valuable polymorphic markers for genotyping and performing phylogenetic analyses in a growing number of pathogens and have given promising results for Y. pestis as well.

resultsIn this study we have genotyped 180 Y. pestis isolates by multiple locus VNTR analysis (MLVA) using 25 markers. Sixty-one different genotypes were observed. The three biovars were distributed into three main branches, with some exceptions. In particular, the Medievalis phenotype is clearly heterogeneous, resulting from different mutation events in the napA gene. Antiqua strains from Asia appear to hold a central position compared to Antiqua strains from Africa. A subset of 7 markers is proposed for the quick comparison of a new strain with the collection typed here. This can be easily achieved using a Web-based facility, specifically set-up for running such identifications.

conclusionTandem-repeat typing may prove to be a powerful complement to the existing phylogenetic tools for Y. pestis. Typing can be achieved quickly at a low cost in terms of consumables, technical expertise and equipment. The resulting data can be easily compared between different laboratories. The number and selection of markers will eventually depend upon the type and aim of investigations.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAfricaAsiaBacterial Typing TechniquesDisease OutbreaksDNA, BacterialGenetic MarkersGenetic VariationGenotypeMinisatellite RepeatsSequence Analysis, DNASpecies SpecificityYersinia pestisDNA, BacterialGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID15186506
PMCPMC436057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.