Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15184677›Full record

SynthesisProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2004

Large-scale meta-analysis of cancer microarray data identifies common transcriptional profiles of neoplastic transformation and progression.

Daniel R Rhodes, Jianjun Yu, K Shanker, Nandan Deshpande, Radhika Varambally, Debashis Ghosh, Terrence Barrette, Akhilesh Pandey, Arul M Chinnaiyan

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 460 papers, 21 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
460citing papers in PubMed, 21 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

460 citing papers in PubMed, 21 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Genes · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

400 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel R RhodesDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, 48109, USA.
Jianjun Yu
K Shanker
Nandan Deshpande
Radhika Varambally
Debashis Ghosh
Terrence Barrette
Akhilesh Pandey
Arul M Chinnaiyan

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI THEODORE S LAWRENCE · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
VACCINIA PSA FOR ANDROGEN-MODULATED POST-SURGICAL RECURRENCE OF PROSTATE CANCERP50CA069568 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI COONEY, KATHLEEN A · 1995 to 2013
$31.3M
Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Microarray DataR01GM072007 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GHOSH, DEBASHIS · 2004 to 2008
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS 5P30 CA46592NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NCI NIH HHS P50 CA069568NCI NIH HHS P50 CA69568NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many studies have used DNA microarrays to identify the gene expression signatures of human cancer, yet the critical features of these often unmanageably large signatures remain elusive. To address this, we developed a statistical method, comparative metaprofiling, which identifies and assesses the intersection of multiple gene expression signatures from a diverse collection of microarray data sets. We collected and analyzed 40 published cancer microarray data sets, comprising 38 million gene expression measurements from >3,700 cancer samples. From this, we characterized a common transcriptional profile that is universally activated in most cancer types relative to the normal tissues from which they arose, likely reflecting essential transcriptional features of neoplastic transformation. In addition, we characterized a transcriptional profile that is commonly activated in various types of undifferentiated cancer, suggesting common molecular mechanisms by which cancer cells progress and avoid differentiation. Finally, we validated these transcriptional profiles on independent data sets.

Indexed as

Oligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisCell Transformation, NeoplasticDisease ProgressionGene Expression ProfilingHumansNeoplasmsTranscription, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID15184677
PMCPMC438973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.