ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2004
Comparison of quantitative and semiquantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for immunoglobulin G against Chlamydophila pneumoniae to a microimmunofluorescence test for use with patients with respiratory tract infections.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Serological Analysis and Drug Resistance ofBioMed research international · 2017Article
- Comparative Seroepidemiologic Analysis of Chlamydophila Pneumoniae Infection using Microimmunofluorescence, Enzyme Immunoassay and Neutralization Test: Implications for Serodiagnosis.Indian journal of microbiology · 2011Article
- Acute hemorrhagic pericarditis in a child with pneumonia due to Chlamydophila pneumoniae.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We previously reported a high degree of variation in the sensitivities of serodiagnostic kits for the detection of Chlamydophila pneumoniae in sera from healthy donors. Since a low predictive value of a test can impair its diagnostic value, we have extended our studies to samples from patients with pneumonia. We focused on the most promising enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) (SeroCP and SeroCP Quant; Savyon) identified in our previous study and included a new ELISA (sELISA; Medac). The agreement between all ELISAs for immunoglobulin G (IgG) and a reference microimmunofluorescence (MIF) test for IgG (SeroFIA; Savyon) was > or = 90% for a collective of 80 patients. The positive predictive values were all > or = 93%. The negative predictive values ranged from 68 to 83%. False-negative results were obtained only for samples that had low titers in the MIF test. The correlation of the IgG antibody titers determined by the MIF and SeroCP Quant tests was high (r(sp) = 0.9). Since the semiquantitative SeroCP and quantitative SeroCP Quant ELISAs achieved the highest sensitivities, they were evaluated further by using a second batch of sera from 50 patients with predominantly medium and low antibody titers in the MIF test and a control collection of sera from 80 children with negative MIF results. Again, the tests showed a high concordance with the MIF results (96%), and the antibody titers in the SeroCP Quant and MIF tests correlated well (r(sp) = 0.8). The specificities determined with the negative sera were > or = 99% for the SeroCP Quant test and 86% for the SeroCP test. These results show that ELISAs that are fast and objective deliver seroprevalence results, sensitivities, and specificities that are very similar to those of the MIF test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.