Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15184408›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2004

Specific T-cell epitopes for immunoassay-based diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection.

Inger Brock, Karin Weldingh, Eliane M S Leyten, Sandra M Arend, Pernille Ravn, Peter Andersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Immunodominant Tuberculosis Antigens Recognized by Human CD4Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Sensitivity-Enhancing Strategies in Optical Biosensing.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  9. TheFrontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Immune Control ofFrontiers in immunology · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Antigens for CD4 and CD8 T cells in tuberculosis.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2014
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Inger BrockDepartment of Infectious Disease Immunology, Statens Serum Institute, Artillerivej 5, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Karin Weldingh
Eliane M S Leyten
Sandra M Arend
Pernille Ravn
Peter Andersen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The currently used method for immunological detection of tuberculosis infection, the tuberculin skin test, has low specificity. Antigens specific for Mycobacterium tuberculosis to replace purified protein derivative are therefore urgently needed. We have performed a rigorous assessment of the diagnostic potential of four recently identified antigens (Rv2653, Rv2654, Rv3873, and Rv3878) from genomic regions that are lacking from the Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine strains as well as from the most common nontuberculous mycobacteria. The fine specificity of potential epitopes in these molecules was evaluated by sensitive testing of the T-cell responses of peripheral blood mononuclear cells derived from M. bovis BCG-vaccinated healthy individuals to synthesized overlapping peptides. Three of the four molecules contained regions with significant specificity problems (Rv2653, Rv3873, and Rv3878). We selected and combined the specific peptide stretches from the four proteins not recognized by M. bovis BCG-vaccinated individuals. These peptide stretches were tested with peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained from patients with microscopy- or culture-confirmed tuberculosis and from healthy M. bovis BCG-vaccinated controls. The combination of the most promising stretches from this analysis showed a sensitivity level (57%) comparable to the level found with the two well-known M. tuberculosis-specific proteins ESAT-6 and CFP-10 (75 and 66%, respectively). The combination of ESAT-6, CFP-10, and the novel specific peptide stretches gave an overall sensitivity of 84% at a specificity of 97%. In a validation experiment with new experimental groups, the sensitivities obtained were 57% for the combination of peptides and 90% for the combination of the peptides, ESAT-6, and CFP-10. This combination gave a specificity of 95%.

Indexed as

Epitopes, T-LymphocyteAdultAgedAmino Acid SequenceAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsFemaleHumansInterferon-gammaMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Sequence DataSensitivity and SpecificityTuberculosisAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsCFP-10 protein, Mycobacterium tuberculosisEpitopes, T-LymphocyteESAT-6 protein, Mycobacterium tuberculosisInterferon-gamma

Identifiers

PMID15184408
PMCPMC427833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.