Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15183099›Full record

ArticleExperimental eye research2004

Phenotypic characterization of human corneal epithelial cells expanded ex vivo from limbal explant and single cell cultures.

Hyun-Seung Kim, Xiu Jun Song, Cintia S de Paiva, Zhuo Chen, Stephen C Pflugfelder, De-Quan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental eye research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 213 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Hyun-Seung KimOcular Surface Center, Cullen Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine,6565 Fannin Street, NC-205, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Xiu Jun Song
Cintia S de Paiva
Zhuo Chen
Stephen C Pflugfelder
De-Quan Li
Baylor College of Medicine · USOcular Surface Center · US

Funding

PATHOGENESIS OF CONJUNCTIVAL SQUAMOUS METAPLASIAR01EY011915 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI PFLUGFELDER, STEPHEN C · 1997 to 2023
$8.0M
Cornea Epithelial Stem Cell Isolation for BioengineeringR03EY014553 · NEI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LI, DE-QUAN · 2003 to 2005
$452k
NEI NIH HHS EY014553NEI NIH HHS EY11915NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011915NEI NIH HHS R03 EY014553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cultivated human corneal epithelial cells have been successfully used for corneal reconstruction. Explant and single cell systems are currently used for human corneal epithelial cultivation. This study was conducted to characterize the phenotypes of human corneal epithelial cells expanded ex vivo by these two culture systems with regard to their growth potential, morphology and antigen expression patterns. Human corneal epithelial cells were expanded by limbal explant culture or limbal single cell suspension culture on a mitomycin C treated 3T3 fibroblast feeder layer. The phenotypes of primary cultured cells were evaluated by morphology and immunohistochemical staining with antibodies for proposed keratinocyte stem cell markers (p63, EGFR, K19 and integrin beta1) and differentiation markers (K3, involucrin and gap junction protein connexin 43). BrdU labeling was performed to identify the label-retaining cells. Human corneal epithelial cells were grown from limbal tissues preserved as long as 16 days by both culture systems. The growth rate depended on the tissue freshness, the time from death to preservation and the time from death to culture, but not on the donor age. Cell growth was observed in 96.2% (n = 43) of single cell suspension cultures and in 90.8% (n = 213) of explant cultures. The cell expansion was confluent in 10-14 days in single cell suspension cultures and 14-21 days in explant cultures. The cell morphology in single cell suspension culture was smaller, more compact and uniform than that in explant culture. Immunostaining showed a greater number of the small cells expressing p63, EGFR, K19 and integrin beta1, while more larger cells stained positively for K3, involucrin and connexin 43 in both culture systems. BrdU-label retaining cells were identified in 2.3+/-0.7% of explant cultures and 3.73+/-1.5% of single cell cultures chased for 21 days. In conclusion, the limbal rims are a great treasure for ex vivo expansion of human corneal epithelial cells. The phenotypes of corneal epithelial cells, ranging from basal cells to superficial differentiated cells, are well maintained in both culture systems. Slow-cycling BrdU-label retaining cells, that are characteristic of stem cells, were identified in the cultures.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBacterial CapsulesBiomarkersBromodeoxyuridineCell DifferentiationCell DivisionCells, CulturedChildChild, PreschoolConnexin 43DNA-Binding ProteinsEpithelium, CornealErbB ReceptorsBiomarkersBromodeoxyuridinecapsular polysaccharide K3Connexin 43DNA-Binding ProteinsErbB ReceptorsIntegrin beta1involucrinPhosphoproteinsPolysaccharides, BacterialProtein PrecursorsTP63 protein, humanTrans-ActivatorsTranscription FactorsTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15183099
PMCPMC2906376
OpenAlexW2088904701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.