Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15181241›Full record

ReviewMolecular neurobiology2004

Mechanisms of dendritic maturation.

Frederic Libersat, Carsten Duch

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Interaction between Neurogenesis and Hippocampal Memory System: New Vistas.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Dscam1 is required for normal dendrite growth and branching but not for dendritic spacing in Drosophila motoneurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Frederic LibersatZlotowski Center for Neuroscience and Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, 84105, Israel. libersat@bgumail.ac.il
Carsten Duch

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The highly complex geometry of dendritic trees is crucial for neural signal integration and the proper wiring of neuronal circuits. The morphogenesis of dendritic trees is regulated by innate genetic factors, neuronal activity, and external molecular cues. How each of these factors contributes to dendritic maturation has been addressed in the developing nervous systems of animals ranging from insects to mammals. The results of such investigations have shown that the contribution of intrinsic and extrinsic factors and activity, however, appear to be weighted differentially in different types of neurons, in different brain areas, and especially in different species. Moreover, it appears that dozens of molecules have been found to regulate dendritic maturation, but it is almost certain that each molecule plays only a specific role in this formidable cooperative venture. This article reviews our current knowledge and understanding of the role of various factors in the establishment of the architecture of mature dendritic trees.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalcium SignalingCell DifferentiationCentral Nervous SystemDendritesGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHormonesHumansNerve Growth FactorsSignal TransductionHormonesNerve Growth Factors

Identifiers

PMID15181241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.