Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15181168›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2004

Probing the pore of the auditory hair cell mechanotransducer channel in turtle.

H E Farris, C L LeBlanc, J Goswami, A J Ricci

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. CaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The conductance and organization of the TMC1-containing mechanotransducer channel complex in auditory hair cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Identifying targets to prevent aminoglycoside ototoxicity.Molecular and cellular neurosciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Atypical tuning and amplification mechanisms in gecko auditory hair cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

H E FarrisNeuroscience Center and Kresge Hearing Laboratories, 2020 Gravier St Suite D, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
C L LeBlanc
J Goswami
A J Ricci

Funding

Tonotopic variations in mechano-electric transductionR01DC003896 · NIDCD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RICCI, ANTHONY J · 1999 to 2022
$11.1M
Mechanical Tuning in Auditory Sensory Hair BundlesF32DC006527 · NIDCD · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HSC NEW ORLEANS · PI FARRIS, HAMILTON E · 2003 to 2004
$99k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC006527NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003896NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC 03896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hair cell mechano-electric transducer (MET) channels play a pivotal role in auditory and vestibular signal detection, yet few data exist regarding their molecular nature. Present work characterizes the MET channel pore, a region whose properties are thought to be intrinsically determined. Two approaches were used. First, the channel was probed with antagonists of candidate channel subtypes including: cyclic nucleotide-gated channels, transient receptor potential channels and gap-junctional channels. Eight new antagonists were identified. Most of the effective antagonists had a partially charged amine group predicted to penetrate the channel pore, antagonizing current flow, while the remainder of the molecule prevented further permeation of the compound through the pore. This blocking mechanism was tested using curare to demonstrate the open channel nature of the block and by identifying methylene blue as a permeant channel blocker. The second approach estimated dimensions of the channel pore with simple amine compounds. The narrowest diameter of the pore was calculated as 12.5 +/- 0.8 A and the location of a binding site approximately 45% of the way through the membrane electric field was calculated. Channel length was estimated as approximately 31 A and the width of the pore mouth at < 17 A. Each effective antagonist had a minimal diameter, measured about the penetrating amine, of less than the pore diameter, with a direct correlation between IC(50) and minimal diameter. The IC(50) was also directly related to the length of the amine side chains, further validating the proposed pore blocking mechanism. Data provided by these two approaches support a hypothesis regarding channel permeation and block that incorporates molecular dimensions and ion interactions within the pore.

Indexed as

AnimalsCyclic Nucleotide-Gated Cation ChannelsDiltiazemDose-Response Relationship, DrugHair Cells, Auditory, InnerIon Channel GatingIon ChannelsMechanotransduction, CellularMembrane PotentialsTurtlesCyclic Nucleotide-Gated Cation ChannelsDiltiazemIon Channels

Identifiers

PMID15181168
PMCPMC1665030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.