ArticleJournal of molecular evolution1992
Statistical analysis and prediction of the exonic structure of human genes.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioinformatics in Russia: history and present-day landscape.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Genome-enable prediction for health traits using high-density SNP panel in US Holstein cattle.Animal genetics · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nonhomologous fully sequenced human protein-coding genes were studied. Three sets of exon-exon junctions were formed defined by the intron (shadow) position relative to the reading frame. For the analysis of intron shadow signals in exons, information content and discrimination energy approaches were used with the correction allowing one to ignore the influence of a protein-coding message. The corrected formulas allow one to define the consensuses for the three types of intron shadow signals as a AG/guwn, cAG/GUnn, and cAG/gunU, and provide better recognition than the original formulas. The analysis of the codon usage in the signal positions leads to the conclusion that the prevalence of some amino acids in corresponding protein sites is caused by the signal requirements and not vice versa. The distribution of potential intron shadow signals in exons contradicts the hypothesis of intron insertion into suitable preexisting sites. There exists a correlation between the intron types and/or the exon length modulo 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
1518091What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.