ArticleDer Pathologe2004
[Classification of etiologic agents in fungal sinusitis by immunohistochemistry, histology and culture].
Article in Der Pathologe, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Differential diagnosis for detection of hyphae in tissue].Der Pathologe · 2013Review
- [Fungal infections of the central nervous system in the immunocompetent host].Der Pathologe · 2013Review
- [Allergic fungal sinusitis, fungus ball and invasive sinonasal mycosis - three fungal-related diseases].Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie : MKG · 2007Article
- [Zygomycetes in biopsies of the gastrointestinal tract].Der Pathologe · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the invasive forms of fungal sinusitis rapid identification of etiologic agent is of vital importance because of the different reaction of the fungi to various antifungal agents. In the non-invasive forms it is of interest for epidemiologic reasons and because of the potential transition to invasive and generalized mycoses in case of additional immunodeficiency. A diagnosis of fungal genus in histologic slides is desirable since up to 70% of the fungal cultures remain without result.In the present study 77 cases of fungal sinusitis were examined with the comercially available antibodies Anti-Aspergillus and Anti-Rhizomucor. The results of the histological examination and fungal cultures were added. The immunohistochemical examination permitted in 64 cases a classification as Aspergillus/Penicillium. Two cases caused by Zygomyzetes alone or in combination could be confirmed immunohistochemically. Four fungus balls showed no significant immunoreaction with both antibodies. If these where caused by other Hyphomycetes p.e. Pseudallescheria or if it where Aspergillus fungus balls that did not react because of extreme regressive change can not be decided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15179525What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.