Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15178612›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2004

Effectiveness of antibiotics in preventing meningococcal disease after a case: systematic review.

Bernadette Purcell, Susanne Samuelsson, Susan J M Hahné, Ingrid Ehrhard, Sigrid Heuberger, Ivonne Camaroni, André Charlett, James M Stuart

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antibiotics for preventing meningococcal infections.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Prophylactic use of antibiotics for prevention of meningococcal infections: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2005
    Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The impact of protein-conjugate polysaccharide vaccines: an endgame for meningitis?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Bernadette PurcellCommunicable Disease Surveillance Centre South West, Gloucester GL10 3RF.
Susanne Samuelsson
Susan J M Hahné
Ingrid Ehrhard
Sigrid Heuberger
Ivonne Camaroni
André Charlett
James M Stuart
Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust · GBLandesuntersuchungsanstalt Sachsen · DENational Public Health Laboratory · NPStatens Serum Institut · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo summarise the evidence for the role of antibiotics in preventing further cases of meningococcal disease through chemoprophylaxis given to the index patient, household contacts, and children in day care settings after a single case.

designSystematic review.

methodsStudies were identified by searching Embase (1983-2003), Medline (1965-2003), and CAB Health (1973-2003) and by contacting the World Health Organization and the European meningococcal disease surveillance network and examining references of identified papers. The review included all studies with at least 10 cases in which outcomes were compared between treated and untreated groups.

main outcome measureSubsequent cases of meningococcal disease 1-30 days after onset of disease in the index patient.

resultsFour observational studies and one small trial met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of studies on chemoprophylaxis given to household contacts showed a significant reduction in risk (risk ratio 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.02 to 0.58). The number needed to treat to prevent a case was estimated as 218 (121 to 1135). Primary outcome data were not available in studies of chemoprophylaxis given to the index patient: when prophylaxis had not been given, rate of carriage after discharge from hospital was estimated as 3% (0 to 6), probably an underestimate of the true rate. No studies of chemoprophylaxis in day care settings were identified that met the inclusion criteria.

conclusionThere have been no high quality experimental trials looking at control policies for meningococcal disease. The best available evidence is from retrospective studies. The risk of meningococcal disease in household contacts of a patient can be reduced by an estimated 89% if they take antibiotics known to eradicate meningococcal carriage. Chemoprophylaxis should be recommended for the index patient and all household contacts.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisHumansMeningococcal InfectionsRisk FactorsSecondary PreventionAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID15178612
PMCPMC420283
OpenAlexW2141001286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.