Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15176484›Full record

ReviewNeurochemical research2004

A molecular description of brain trauma pathophysiology using microarray technology: an overview.

Pramod K Dash, Nobuhide Kobori, Anthony N Moore

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurochemical research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Research progress on biomarkers of traumatic brain injury.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pramod K DashDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, and The Vivian L. Smith Center for Neurologic Research, The University of Texas Medical School, Houston, Texas 77225, USA. p.dash@uth.tmc.edu
Nobuhide Kobori
Anthony N Moore

Funding

MECHANISMS OF MEMORY DEFICITS FOLLOWING BRAIN INJURYR01NS035457 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI DASH, PRAMOD K · 1997 to 2006
$2.2M
NINDS NIH HHS NS35457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been estimated that 50% of human transcriptome, the collection of mRNA in a cell, is expressed in the brain, making it one of the most complex organs to understand in terms of genomic responses to injury. The availability of genome sequences for several organisms coupled with the increasing affordability of microarray technologies makes it feasible to monitor the mRNA levels of thousands of genes simultaneously. In this paper, we provide an overview of findings using both cDNA- and oligonucleotide-based microarray analyses after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI). Specifically, the utility of this methodology as a means of cataloging the biochemical sequelae of brain trauma and elucidating novel genes or pathways for further study is discussed. Furthermore, we offer future directions for the continued evaluation of microarray results and discuss the usefulness of microarray techniques as a testing format for determining the efficacy of mechanism-based therapies.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainBrain InjuriesDNA, ComplementaryGene Expression RegulationHumansOligodeoxyribonucleotidesOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsTranscription, GeneticDNA, ComplementaryOligodeoxyribonucleotides

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.