Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15175178›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2004

Breast cancer risk and historical exposure to pesticides from wide-area applications assessed with GIS.

Julia Green Brody, Ann Aschengrau, Wendy McKelvey, Ruthann A Rudel, Christopher H Swartz, Theresa Kennedy

Open access · diamondAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Modern sources of controls in case-control studies.American journal of epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Introduction to the Special Issue ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. A case-control study of breast cancer risk and ambient exposure to pesticides.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Aerial pesticide application causes DNA damage in pilots from Sinaloa, Mexico.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julia Green BrodySilent Spring Institute, 29 Crafts Street, Newton, MA 02458, USA. brody@silentspring.org
Ann Aschengrau
Wendy McKelvey
Ruthann A Rudel
Christopher H Swartz
Theresa Kennedy
Silent Spring Institute · US

Funding

Training CoreP42ES007381 · NIEHS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI HAHN, MARK E · 1995 to 2019
$46.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS 2P42 ES 07381
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pesticides are of interest in etiologic studies of breast cancer because many mimic estrogen, a known breast cancer risk factor, or cause mammary tumors in animals, but most previous studies have been limited by using one-time tissue measurements of residues of only a few pesticides long banned in the United States. As an alternative method to assess historical exposures to banned and current-use pesticides, we used geographic information system (GIS) technology in a population-based case-control study of 1,165 women residing in Cape Cod, Massachusetts, who were diagnosed with breast cancer in 1988-1995 and 1,006 controls. We assessed exposures dating back to 1948 (when DDT was first used there) from pesticides applied for tree pests (e.g., gypsy moths), cranberry bogs, other agriculture, and mosquito control on wetlands. We found no overall pattern of association between pesticide use and breast cancer. We found modest increases in risk associated with aerial application of persistent pesticides on cranberry bogs and less persistent pesticides applied for tree pests or agriculture. Adjusted odds ratios for these exposures were 1.8 or lower, and, with a few exceptions, confidence intervals did not exclude the null. The study is limited by uncertainty about locations of home addresses (particularly before 1980) and unrecorded tree pest and mosquito control events as well as lack of information about exposures during years when women in the study lived off Cape Cod and about women with potentially important early life exposures on Cape Cod who were not included because they moved away.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureGeographic Information SystemsAgedAged, 80 and overAgricultureBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesDDTFemaleHistory, 20th CenturyHumansIncidenceMassachusettsMiddle AgedPest ControlPesticidesDDTPesticides

Identifiers

PMID15175178
PMCPMC1242018
OpenAlexW2056290133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.