Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15173110›Full record

ArticleGenome research2004

Bacterial genomes as new gene homes: the genealogy of ORFans in E. coli.

Vincent Daubin, Howard Ochman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 144 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
144citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

144 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 263 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Imported, not invented, genes prevail amongProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. TRGdb: a universal resource for the exploration of taxonomically restricted genes in bacteria.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023
    Article
  12. On the Unknown Proteins of Eukaryotic Proteomes.Journal of molecular evolution · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

84 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vincent DaubinDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biophysics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA. daubin@email.arizona.edu
Howard Ochman
University of Arizona · US

Funding

Genome Erosion in Infectious MicroorganismsR01GM056120 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI OCHMAN, HOWARD · 1997 to 2007
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM56120NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM056120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differences in gene repertoire among bacterial genomes are usually ascribed to gene loss or to lateral gene transfer from unrelated cellular organisms. However, most bacteria contain large numbers of ORFans, that is, annotated genes that are restricted to a particular genome and that possess no known homologs. The uniqueness of ORFans within a genome has precluded the use of a comparative approach to examine their function and evolution. However, by identifying sequences unique to monophyletic groups at increasing phylogenetic depths, we can make direct comparisons of the characteristics of ORFans of different ages in the Escherichia coli genome, and establish their functional status and evolutionary rates. Relative to the genes ancestral to gamma-Proteobacteria and to those genes distributed sporadically in other prokaryotic species, ORFans in the E. coli lineage are short, A+T rich, and evolve quickly. Moreover, most encode functional proteins. Based on these features, ORFans are not attributable to errors in gene annotation, limitations of current databases, or to failure of methods for detecting homology. Rather, ORFans in the genomes of free-living microorganisms apparently derive from bacteriophage and occasionally become established by assuming roles in key cellular functions.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialAT Rich SequenceBase CompositionDNA, BacterialEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsEvolution, MolecularGenes, BacterialOpen Reading FramesPhylogenyDNA, BacterialEscherichia coli Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15173110
PMCPMC419781
OpenAlexW2108035844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.