ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2004
Gail model risk assessment and risk perceptions.
Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effect of interventions including provision of personalised cancer risk information on accuracy of risk perception and psychological responses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Patient education and counseling · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Predictors of perceived susceptibility of breast cancer and changes over time: a mixed modeling approach.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2008Trial
- Mammography screening after risk-tailored messages: the women improving screening through education and risk assessment (WISER) randomized, controlled trial.Journal of women's health (2002)Trial
- Assessment of the risk of developing breast cancer using the Gail model in Asian females: A systematic review.Heliyon · 2020Review
- Understanding Decision Making about Breast Cancer Prevention in Action: The Intersection of Perceived Risk, Perceived Control, and Social Context: NRG Oncology/NSABP DMP-1.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2019Article
- Responses to provision of personalised cancer risk information: a qualitative interview study with members of the public.BMC public health · 2017Article
- A Risk Assessment Comparison of Breast Cancer and Factors Affected to Risk Perception of Women in Turkey: A Cross-sectional Study.Iranian journal of public health · 2017Article
- Breast cancer risk assessment in 64,659 women at a single high-volume mammography clinic.Academic radiology · 2012Article
- Conceptual problems in laypersons' understanding of individualized cancer risk: a qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2009Article
- Recruiting diverse patients to a breast cancer risk communication trial--waiting rooms can improve access.Journal of the National Medical Association · 2007Article
- Breast cancer risk assessment in socioeconomically disadvantaged urban communities.Journal of the National Medical Association · 2007Article
- Spiritual coping, family history, and perceived risk for breast cancer--can we make sense of it?Journal of genetic counseling · 2006Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients can benefit from accessible breast cancer risk information. The Gail model is a well-known means of providing risk information to patients and for guiding clinical decisions. Risk presentation often includes 5-year and life-time percent chances for a woman to develop breast cancer. How do women perceive their risks after Gail model risk assessment? This exploratory study used a randomized clinical trial design to address this question among women not previously selected for breast cancer risk. Results suggest a brief risk assessment intervention changes quantitative and comparative risk perceptions and improves accuracy. This study improves our understanding of risk perceptions by evaluating an intervention in a population not previously selected for high-risk status and measuring perceptions in a variety of formats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15171107What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.