Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15169903›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2004

RB reversibly inhibits DNA replication via two temporally distinct mechanisms.

Steven P Angus, Christopher N Mayhew, David A Solomon, Wesley A Braden, Michael P Markey, Yukiko Okuno, M Cristina Cardoso, David M Gilbert, Erik S Knudsen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. RB1, development, and cancer.Current topics in developmental biology · 2011
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Proapoptotic role of novel gene-expression factors.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2007
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Steven P AngusDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH 45267, USA.
Christopher N Mayhew
David A Solomon
Wesley A Braden
Michael P Markey
Yukiko Okuno
M Cristina Cardoso
David M Gilbert
Erik S Knudsen
University of Cincinnati Medical Center · USSUNY Upstate Medical University · USMax Delbrück Center · DE

Funding

REGULATION OF CELLULAR GROWTH AND DIFFERENTIATIONT32CA059268 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI KHAN, SOHAIB A. · 1993 to 2010
$2.3M
Specification of Mammalian Replication OriginsR01GM057233 · NIGMS · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI GILBERT, DAVID M · 1998 to 2005
$1.8M
RB-mediated replication controlR01CA106471 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI KNUDSEN, ERIK · 2004 to 2008
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA-106471NCI NIH HHS R01 CA106471NCI NIH HHS T32 CA059268NCI NIH HHS T32 CA 59268NIGMS NIH HHS GM-57233-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The retinoblastoma (RB) tumor suppressor is a critical negative regulator of cellular proliferation. Repression of E2F-dependent transcription has been implicated as the mechanism through which RB inhibits cell cycle progression. However, recent data have suggested that the direct interaction of RB with replication factors or sites of DNA synthesis may contribute to its ability to inhibit S phase. Here we show that RB does not exert a cis-acting effect on DNA replication. Furthermore, the localization of RB was distinct from replication foci in proliferating cells. While RB activation strongly attenuated the RNA levels of multiple replication factors, their protein expression was not diminished coincident with cell cycle arrest. During the first 24 h of RB activation, components of the prereplication complex, initiation factors, and the clamp loader complex (replication factor C) remained tethered to chromatin. In contrast, the association of PCNA and downstream components of the processive replication machinery was specifically disrupted. This signaling from RB occurred in a manner dependent on E2F-mediated transcriptional repression. Following long-term activation of RB, we observed the attenuation of multiple replication factors, the complete cessation of DNA synthesis, and impaired replicative capacity in vitro. Therefore, functional distinctions exist between the "chronic" RB-mediated arrest state and the "acute" arrest state. Strikingly, attenuation of RB activity reversed both acute and chronic replication blocks. Thus, continued RB action is required for the maintenance of two kinetically and functionally distinct modes of replication inhibition.

Indexed as

Genes, RetinoblastomaAllelesAnimalsCell DivisionCell LineCells, CulturedDNA ReplicationMiceMutationPeptide Elongation FactorsProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenRatsRetinoblastoma ProteinS PhaseTranscription, GeneticPeptide Elongation FactorsProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenRetinoblastoma Protein

Identifiers

PMID15169903
PMCPMC419877
OpenAlexW2150913987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.