ArticleThe Journal of physiology2004
Functional interaction between extracellular sodium, potassium and inactivation gating in HERG channels.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacogenetics of Potassium Channel Blockers.Cardiac electrophysiology clinics · 2016Review
- Extracellular potassium effects are conserved within the rat erg K+ channel family.The Journal of physiology · 2005Article
- Extracellular sodium interacts with the HERG channel at an outer pore site.The Journal of general physiology · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
We have studied the interaction between extracellular K(+) (K(+)(o)) and extracellular Na(+) (Na(+)(o)) in human ether-à-go-go related gene (HERG)-encoded K(+) channels expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells, using the whole-cell voltage clamp technique. Prior studies indicate that Na(+)(o) potently inhibits HERG current (IC(50) 3 mm) by binding to an outer pore site, and also speeds recovery from inactivation. In this study, we sought to explore the relationship between the Na(+)(o) effect on recovery and Na(+)(o) inhibition of HERG current, and to determine whether inactivation gating plays a critical role in Na(+)(o) inhibition of HERG current. Na(+)(o) concentration-response relationships for current inhibition and speeding of recovery were different, with Na(+)(o) less potent at speeding recovery. Na(+)(o) inhibition of HERG current was relieved by physiological [K(+)](o), while Na(+)(o) speeded recovery from inactivation similarly in the absence or presence of physiological [K(+)](o). To examine the link between Na(+)(o) block and inactivation using an independent approach, we studied hyperpolarization-activated currents uncoupled from inactivation in the S4-S5 linker mutant D540K. Depolarization-activated D540K currents were inhibited by Na(+)(o), while hyperpolarization-activated currents were augmented by Na(+)(o). This result reveals a direct link between Na(+)(o) inhibition and a depolarization-induced conformational change, most likely inactivation. We attempted to simulate the disparate concentration-response relationships for the two effects of Na(+)(o) using a kinetic model that included Na(+)(o) site(s) affected by permeation and gating. While a model with only a single dynamic Na(+)(o) site was inadequate, a model with two distinct Na(+)(o) sites was sufficient to reproduce the data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.