Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15169744›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2004

Rates of caesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery in nulliparous women after low concentration epidural infusions or opioid analgesia: systematic review.

E H C Liu, A T H Sia

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02710877 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Pain Management During Labor: Use of Intermittent Drug Delivery Devices for Obstetric and Neonatal Outcome Improvement and Health-care Burden Reduction

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaRan2014 to 2018Enrolled671ConditionsLabor PainArmsProgrammed Intermittent bolus, Manual epidural bolus, Levobupivacaine, Sufentanil 4 mcg, Sufentanil 5 mcg
NCT03137251 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation During Labor. A Triple Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Las Palmas de Gran CanariaRan2017 to 2018Enrolled63ConditionsMidwifery, PregnancyArmsTENS 1, TENS 2, Placebo TENS
NCT03730753 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Versus Continuous Infusion When Added to Patient-controlled Epidural Analgesia on Bupivacaine Consumption in Labour Analgesia: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversité de SherbrookeRan2019 to 2025Enrolled200ConditionsLabor PainArmsProgrammed intermittent epidural bolus, Continuous infusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 170 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Early versus late initiation of epidural analgesia for labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Effects of Labor Epidural Analgesia on Short Term Neonatal Morbidity.International journal of women's health · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E H C LiuDepartment of Anaesthesia, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074. analiue@nus.edu.sg
A T H Sia
KK Women's and Children's Hospital · SGNational University Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the effects of low concentration epidural infusions of bupivacaine with parenteral opioid analgesia on rates of caesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery in nulliparous women. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, the Cochrane controlled trials register, and handsearching of the International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. STUDY SELECTION: Randomised controlled trials comparing low concentration epidural infusions with parenteral opioids. DATA SYNTHESIS: Seven trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Epidural analgesia does not seem to be associated with an increased risk of caesarean section (odds ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 1.48) but may be associated with an increased risk of instrumental vaginal delivery (2.11, 0.95 to 4.65). Epidural analgesia was associated with a longer second stage of labour (weighted mean difference 15.2 minutes, 2.1 to 28.2 minutes). More women randomised to receive epidural analgesia had adequate pain relief, with fewer changing to parenteral opioids than vice versa (odds ratio 0.1, 0.05 to 0.22).

conclusionsEpidural analgesia using low concentration infusions of bupivacaine is unlikely to increase the risk of caesarean section but may increase the risk of instrumental vaginal delivery. Although women receiving epidural analgesia had a longer second stage of labour, they had better pain relief.

Indexed as

Analgesia, EpiduralAnalgesia, ObstetricalAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineCesarean SectionDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansObstetric Labor ComplicationsParityPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsVacuum Extraction, ObstetricalAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaine

Identifiers

PMID15169744
PMCPMC421779
OpenAlexW2007158465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.