Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15168607›Full record

ReviewJournal of bioenergetics and biomembranes2004

DNA transport and natural transformation in mesophilic and thermophilic bacteria.

Beate Averhoff

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The human gut resistome: Current concepts & future prospects.The Indian journal of medical research · 2019
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Type IV pilin proteins: versatile molecular modules.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2012
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Thermus thermophilus as biological model.Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2009
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Beate AverhoffBereich Genetik, Department Biologie I, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Maria-Ward-Strasse 1a, 80638 München, Germany. b.averhoff@lrz.uni-muenchen.de
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative genome analyses revealed a massive DNA exchange between microbes of distant evolutionary lineages. This phenomenon known as horizontal, or lateral, gene transfer has a tremendous impact in the evolution of prokaryotes. Here, the process of DNA transport via genetic transformation is discussed. This review will focus on the process of DNA uptake mediated by type IV pilin-like proteins in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Three tentative models of transformation machineries comprising components similar to proteins of type IV pili and type II secretion are presented. A comparative discussion of the structure of DNA translocators and the underlying mechanism of transfer of free DNA in mesophilic and extremely thermophilic bacteria highlights conserved and distinctive features of the DNA translocators in mesophilic and thermophilic bacteria.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaModels, BiologicalArchaeaBiological Transport, ActiveCarrier ProteinsCell MembraneDNAFimbriae ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, ArchaealGene Expression Regulation, BacterialSignal TransductionTransformation, GeneticCarrier ProteinsDNAFimbriae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15168607
OpenAlexW2045039264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.