Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15164053›Full record

ArticleNature2004

DNA sequence and analysis of human chromosome 9.

S J Humphray, K Oliver, A R Hunt, R W Plumb, J E Loveland, K L Howe, T D Andrews, S Searle, S E Hunt, C E Scott and 138 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
28.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 654 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA)Translational cancer research · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Genes Co-Expressed withInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Altered DNA Methylation Profiles inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

148 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

S J HumphrayThe Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK. sjh@sanger.ac.uk
K Oliver
A R Hunt
R W Plumb
J E Loveland
K L Howe
T D Andrews
S Searle
S E Hunt
C E Scott
M C Jones
R Ainscough
J P Almeida
K D Ambrose
R I S Ashwell
A K Babbage
S Babbage
C L Bagguley
J Bailey
R Banerjee
D J Barker
K F Barlow
K Bates
H Beasley
O Beasley
C P Bird
S Bray-Allen
A J Brown
J Y Brown
D Burford
W Burrill
J Burton
C Carder
N P Carter
J C Chapman
Y Chen
G Clarke
S Y Clark
C M Clee
S Clegg
R E Collier
N Corby
M Crosier
A T Cummings
J Davies
P Dhami
M Dunn
I Dutta
L W Dyer
M E Earthrowl
L Faulkner
C J Fleming
A Frankish
J A Frankland
L French
D G Fricker
P Garner
J Garnett
J Ghori
J G R Gilbert
C Glison
D V Grafham
S Gribble
C Griffiths
S Griffiths-Jones
R Grocock
J Guy
R E Hall
S Hammond
J L Harley
E S I Harrison
E A Hart
P D Heath
C D Henderson
B L Hopkins
P J Howard
P J Howden
E Huckle
C Johnson
D Johnson
A A Joy
M Kay
S Keenan
J K Kershaw
A M Kimberley
A King
A Knights
G K Laird
C Langford
S Lawlor
D A Leongamornlert
M Leversha
C Lloyd
D M Lloyd
J Lovell
S Martin
M Mashreghi-Mohammadi
L Matthews
S McLaren
K E McLay
A McMurray
S Milne
T Nickerson
J Nisbett
G Nordsiek
A V Pearce
A I Peck
K M Porter
R Pandian
S Pelan
B Phillimore
S Povey
Y Ramsey
V Rand
M Scharfe
H K Sehra
R Shownkeen
S K Sims
C D Skuce
M Smith
C A Steward
D Swarbreck
N Sycamore
J Tester
A Thorpe
A Tracey
A Tromans
D W Thomas
M Wall
J M Wallis
A P West
S L Whitehead
D L Willey
S A Williams
L Wilming
P W Wray
L Young
J L Ashurst
A Coulson
H Blöcker
R Durbin
J E Sulston
T Hubbard
M J Jackson
D R Bentley
S Beck
J Rogers
I Dunham
Wellcome Sanger Institute · GBHelmholtz Centre for Infection Research · DENewcastle University · GBCentre for Life · GBGerman Center for Infection Research · DEUniversity College London · GBWellcome Trust · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosome 9 is highly structurally polymorphic. It contains the largest autosomal block of heterochromatin, which is heteromorphic in 6-8% of humans, whereas pericentric inversions occur in more than 1% of the population. The finished euchromatic sequence of chromosome 9 comprises 109,044,351 base pairs and represents >99.6% of the region. Analysis of the sequence reveals many intra- and interchromosomal duplications, including segmental duplications adjacent to both the centromere and the large heterochromatic block. We have annotated 1,149 genes, including genes implicated in male-to-female sex reversal, cancer and neurodegenerative disease, and 426 pseudogenes. The chromosome contains the largest interferon gene cluster in the human genome. There is also a region of exceptionally high gene and G + C content including genes paralogous to those in the major histocompatibility complex. We have also detected recently duplicated genes that exhibit different rates of sequence divergence, presumably reflecting natural selection.

Indexed as

GenesPhysical Chromosome MappingBase CompositionChromosomes, Human, Pair 9EuchromatinEvolution, MolecularFemaleGene DuplicationGenes, DuplicateGenetics, MedicalGenetic VariationGenomicsHeterochromatinHumansMaleNeoplasmsEuchromatinHeterochromatin

Identifiers

PMID15164053
PMCPMC2734081
OpenAlexW2103225674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.