Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15163693›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2004

An experiment of nature: brain anatomy parallels cognition and behavior in Williams syndrome.

Allan L Reiss, Mark A Eckert, Fredric E Rose, Asya Karchemskiy, Shelli Kesler, Melody Chang, Margaret F Reynolds, Hower Kwon, Al Galaburda

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 269 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Autism and Williams syndrome: truly mirror conditions in the socio-cognitive domain?International journal of developmental disabilities · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. [Hidden Markov models for human interactive behavior].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2019
    Article
  20. Article

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Allan L ReissDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA. reiss@stanford.edu
Mark A Eckert
Fredric E Rose
Asya Karchemskiy
Shelli Kesler
Melody Chang
Margaret F Reynolds
Hower Kwon
Al Galaburda
Stanford University · USHarvard University Press · USSalk Institute for Biological Studies · US

Funding

Williams Syndrome: The Molecular Genetic CharacterizationP01HD033113 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HALGREN, ERIC · 1996 to 2015
$19.4M
IMAGING SOFTWARE &METHODS FOR MAPPING BRAIN DEVELOPMENTR01HD031715 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI REISS, ALLAN L · 1994 to 2004
$1.2M
NEUROPSYCHIATRY OF FRAGILE X AND OTHER GENETIC DISORDERSK02MH001142 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI REISS, ALLAN L · 1994 to 2003
$615k
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD033113NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD33113NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD031715NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD31715NIMH NIH HHS K02 MH01142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Williams syndrome (WS) is a neurogenetic-neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by a highly variable and enigmatic profile of cognitive and behavioral features. Relative to overall intellect, affected individuals demonstrate disproportionately severe visual-spatial deficits and enhanced emotionality and face processing. In this study, high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging data were collected from 43 individuals with WS and 40 age- and gender-matched healthy controls. Given the distinct cognitive-behavioral dissociations associated with this disorder, we hypothesized that neuroanatomical integrity in WS would be diminished most in regions comprising the visual-spatial system and most "preserved" or even augmented in regions involved in emotion and face processing. Both volumetric analysis and voxel-based morphometry were used to provide convergent approaches for detecting the hypothesized WS neuroanatomical profile. After adjusting for overall brain volume, participants with WS showed reduced thalamic and occipital lobe gray matter volumes and reduced gray matter density in subcortical and cortical regions comprising the human visual-spatial system compared with controls. The WS group also showed disproportionate increases in volume and gray matter density in several areas known to participate in emotion and face processing, including the amygdala, orbital and medial prefrontal cortices, anterior cingulate, insular cortex, and superior temporal gyrus. These findings point to specific neuroanatomical correlates for the unique topography of cognitive and behavioral features associated with this disorder.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceCerebral CortexChildCognitionEmotionsFaceFemaleFrontal LobeFunctional LateralityGyrus CinguliHumansImage EnhancementIntelligence TestsMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID15163693
PMCPMC3061615
OpenAlexW2138121552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.