ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2004
Single-dose daily administration of cyclosporin A for relapsing nephrotic syndrome.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Significance of combined cyclosporine-prednisolone therapy and cyclosporine blood concentration monitoring for idiopathic membranous nephropathy with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: a randomized controlled multicenter trial.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2014Trial
- Preprandial microemulsion cyclosporine administration is effective for patients with refractory nephrotic syndrome.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2009Trial
- Nephrotoxicity in children with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome receiving long-term cyclosporine treatment.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2017Article
- Predictive risk factors of steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome in children.Journal of nephropathology · 2017Article
- Use of Cyclosporine Therapy in Steroid Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome (SRNS): A Review.Global journal of health science · 2015Review
- Prediction of high-degree steroid dependency in pediatric idiopathic nephrotic syndrome.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2008Article
- Low-dose cyclosporine A in a patient with X-linked immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy and enteropathy.European journal of pediatrics · 2005Article
- Single-dose daily administration of cyclosporin A for refractory nephrotic syndrome.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cyclosporin A (CsA) has been reported to be effective as a steroid-sparing agent in frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (FRNS). However, low efficacy has sometimes been observed in selected patients with steroid-dependent FRNS. We speculated that a low peak level of CsA in the blood might be the cause, and conducted a prospective pilot study on such steroid-dependent FRNS patients to examine whether single-dose daily administration of CsA would yield a sufficient peak blood level, and therefore a satisfactory steroid-sparing effect. Five children with steroid-dependent FRNS, aged 7-16 years, were enrolled in the study. All had been treated with prednisolone combined with twice daily CsA ( T), which was subsequently replaced with the single-dose daily administration protocol ( S), because of a poor steroid-sparing effect. Although the mean daily CsA dosage with the S protocol was significantly lower than with the T protocol ( S 2.4+/-1.1 mg/kg per day vs. T 3.6+/-0.8 mg/kg per day, P<0.05), the mean peak blood level tended to be higher with the S protocol than the T protocol ( S 764+/-122 ng/ml vs. T 358+/-250 ng/ml, P=0.1797) without mean trough blood level elevation. As a result, the minimum dose of prednisolone required for maintenance of clinical remission tended to be lower with the S than the T protocol ( S 0.4+/-0.2 mg/kg on alternate days vs. T 0.6+/-0.4 mg/kg on alternate days, P=0.0656). No evidence of CsA nephrotoxicity was observed in a repeat renal biopsy performed 9 months after commencement of the S protocol in one patient. These clinical observations, although on a small number of patients and preliminary, suggest that single-dose daily administration of CsA might be an attractive protocol in selected patients with steroid-dependent FRNS in whom CsA administration by the conventional protocol is associated with a poor steroid-sparing effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.