Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15159209›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2004

Inhibition of Ape1 nuclease activity by lead, iron, and cadmium.

Daniel R McNeill, Avinash Narayana, Heng-Kuan Wong, David M Wilson

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Mechanisms of Heavy Metal Cadmium (Cd)-Induced Malignancy.Biological trace element research · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Role of Ape1 in Impaired DNA Repair Capacity in Battery Recycling Plant Workers Exposed to Lead.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Potential Role of APEX1 During Ferroptosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Exposure to Engineered Nanomaterials: Impact on DNA Repair Pathways.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel R McNeillLaboratory of Molecular Gerontology, Gerontology Research Center, National Institute on Aging, Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Baltimore, Maryland 21224-6825, USA.
Avinash Narayana
Heng-Kuan Wong
David M Wilson
National Institute on Aging · US

Funding

Repair Mechanisms For Oxidative DNA DamageZIAAG000743 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI WILSON, DAVID · 2009 to 2015
$2.5M
Repair Mechanisms For Strand Breaks in DNAZ01AG000743 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI WILSON, DAVID M · 2002 to 2008
$932k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many environmental metals are co-carcinogens, eliciting their effects via inhibition of DNA repair. Apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease 1 (Ape1) is the major mammalian abasic endonuclease and initiates repair of this cytotoxic/mutagenic lesion by incising the DNA backbone via a Mg(2+)-dependent reaction. In this study we examined the effects of arsenite [As(III)], cadmium [Cd(II)], cobalt [Co(II)], iron [Fe(II)], nickel [Ni(II)], and lead [Pb(II)] at concentrations ranging from 0.3 to 100 microM on the incision activity of Ape1 in the presence of 1 mM MgCl(subscript)2(/subscript). Pb(II) and Fe(II) inhibited Ape1 activity at each of the concentrations tested, with an IC(subscript)50(/subscript) (half-maximal inhibitory concentration) of 0.61 and 1.0 microM, respectively. Cd(II) also inhibited Ape1 activity but only at concentrations > 10 microM. No inhibition was seen with As(III), Co(II), or Ni(II). A similar inhibition pattern was observed with the homologous Escherichia coli protein, exonuclease III, but no inhibition was seen with the structurally distinct AP endonuclease E. coli endonuclease IV, indicating a targeted effect of Pb(II), Fe(II), and Cd(II) on the Ape1-like repair enzymes. Excess nonspecific DNA did not abrogate the metal inactivation, suggesting a protein-specific effect. Notably, Cd(II), Fe(II), and Pb(II) [but not As(III), Co(II), or Ni(II)] inhibited AP endonuclease activity in whole-cell extracts but had no significant effect on single nucleotide gap filling, 5'-flap endonuclease, and nick ligation activities, supporting the idea of selective inactivation of Ape1 in cells. Our results are the first to identify a potential DNA repair enzyme target for lead and suggest a means by which these prevalent environmental metals may elicit their deleterious effects.

Indexed as

CadmiumCell Culture TechniquesDNA-(Apurinic or Apyrimidinic Site) LyaseDNA DamageDNA RepairDose-Response Relationship, DrugEscherichia coliGene Expression ProfilingHumansIronLeadMetals, HeavyCadmiumDNA-(Apurinic or Apyrimidinic Site) LyaseIronLeadMetals, Heavy

Identifiers

PMID15159209
PMCPMC1241995
OpenAlexW2141604349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.