Trial reportDer Orthopade2004
[Treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee joint. Efficacy and tolerance to acemetacin slow release in comparison to celecoxib].
Trial report in Der Orthopade, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Celecoxib for osteoarthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Single dose oral acemetacin for acute postoperative pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- Lack of effects of acemetacin on signalling pathways for leukocyte adherence may explain its gastrointestinal safety.British journal of pharmacology · 2008Article
- Mechanisms underlying the anti-inflammatory activity and gastric safety of acemetacin.British journal of pharmacology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this trial was to compare acemetacin (ACE) with celecoxib (CEL) in terms of tolerability and efficacy in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee joint.
methodsA total of 105 patients (26-64 years old) suffering from primary osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee were enrolled in this international, multicenter, randomized, double blind controlled trial. Fifty three patients were given ACE and 52 CEL. They were treated with either 90 mg bid of slow release ACE or 200 mg bid of CEL for 6 weeks. Additional gastroprotective therapy was not provided. Tolerability was assessed by physical examination, laboratory tests, vital signs and reports of side effects, as well as by patient and physician global assessments. Efficacy parameters comprised pain assessment by visual analogue scale (VAS) and ordinal scale, WOMAC, SF-36 and patient and physician global impressions of efficacy. In addition, acetaminophen consumption was recorded.
resultsIn 21 ACE (39.6%) and 19 CEL patients (36.5%), the number of side effects totaled 56 (ACE n=29; CEL n=27) (ns). Mean pain reduction at week 6 was highly significant ( P<0.0001) in both groups and amounted to 38.7 mm (+/-20.3) in the ACE group and to 35.1 mm (+/-18.7) in the CEL group (ns). Very similar results were seen with respect to the other efficacy parameters.
conclusionACE is not inferior to CEL for the short-term treatment of knee OA in terms of tolerability and efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.