Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15155671›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2004

The serine protease motif of EspC from enteropathogenic Escherichia coli produces epithelial damage by a mechanism different from that of Pet toxin from enteroaggregative E. coli.

Fernando Navarro-García, Adrián Canizalez-Roman, Bao Quan Sui, James P Nataro, Yenia Azamar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Repurposing of Furin Inhibitors to Reduce PathogenicAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. IgG BindsFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Curcumin Blocks Cytotoxicity of Enteroaggregative and EnteropathogenicFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019
    Article
  10. Intestinal cell migration damage induced by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strains.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fernando Navarro-GarcíaDepartment of Cell Biology, CINVESTAV-IPN, 07000 México, DF, Mexico. fnavarro@cell.cinvestav.mx
Adrián Canizalez-Roman
Bao Quan Sui
James P Nataro
Yenia Azamar
Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute · MXUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

EspC (Escherichia coli secreted protein C) of enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) shows the three classical domains of the autotransporter proteins and has a conserved serine protease motif belonging to the SPATE (serine protease autotransporters of Enterobacteriaceae) subfamily. EspC and its homolog Pet in enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) bear the same sequence within the serine protease motif, and both proteins produce enterotoxic effects, suggesting that like Pet, EspC could be internalized to reach and cleave the calmodulin-binding domain of fodrin, causing actin cytoskeleton disruption. Even though both proteins cause cytoskeleton damage by virtue of their serine protease motifs, the following evidence supports the hypothesis that the mechanisms are different. (i) To obtain similar cytotoxic and cytoskeletal effects, a threefold-higher EspC concentration and a twofold-higher exposure time are needed. (ii) EspC internalization into epithelial cells takes more time (6 h) than Pet internalization (30 min), and the distributions of the two proteins inside the cells are also different. (iii) Both proteins have affinity for fodrin and cleave it, but the cleavage sites are different; EspC produces two cleavages, while Pet produces just one. (iv) EspC does not cause fodrin redistribution within epithelial cells. (v) An EspC serine protease motif mutant, but not a Pet serine protease mutant, competes with EspC by blocking cytoskeletal damage. All these data suggest that the protein conformational structure is very important for the activity of the catalytic site, influencing its interaction with the target protein and its internalization. The differences between these proteins may explain the reduced ability of EspC to cause cytopathic effects. However, these differences may confer a specialized role on EspC in the pathogenesis of EPEC, which is different from that of Pet in EAEC pathogenesis.

Indexed as

Amino Acid MotifsBacterial ToxinsCarrier ProteinsCell LineCytoskeletonEnterotoxinsEpithelial CellsEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsHumansMicrofilament ProteinsMutagenesis, Site-DirectedMutationSerine EndopeptidasesSpectrinBacterial ToxinsCarrier ProteinsEnterotoxinsEscherichia coli ProteinsEspC protein, E coliheat-labile enterotoxin, E coliMicrofilament ProteinsPet protein, E coliSerine EndopeptidasesSpectrin

Identifiers

PMID15155671
PMCPMC415714
OpenAlexW2169030610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.