Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15155623›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2004

Comparative analysis of EspF from enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli in alteration of epithelial barrier function.

V K Viswanathan, Athanasia Koutsouris, Sandra Lukic, Mark Pilkinton, Ivana Simonovic, Miljan Simonovic, Gail Hecht

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. EnterohemorrhagicFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Human Intestinal Barrier Function in Health and Disease.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2016
    Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

V K ViswanathanDepartment of Medicine, Section of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, University of Illinois at Chicago and Chicago Veterans Administration Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Athanasia Koutsouris
Sandra Lukic
Mark Pilkinton
Ivana Simonovic
Miljan Simonovic
Gail Hecht
University of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Enteropathogenic E. coli Effects on Intestinal FunctionR01DK050694 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI HECHT, GAIL A · 1997 to 2010
$3.2M
ENTEROHEMORRHAGIC E COLI ALTER INTESTINAL FUNCTIONR01DK058964 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI HECHT, GAIL A · 2000 to 2011
$2.8M
Role of EPEC secreted protein EspF in pathogenesisK01DK063030 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI VISWANATHAN, V K · 2003 to 2005
$371k
Enteropathogenic E. Coli Effects on Intestinal FunctionR56DK050694 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI HECHT, GAIL A · 2012 to 2012
$335k
NIDDK NIH HHS DK50694NIDDK NIH HHS DK58964NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK063030NIDDK NIH HHS KO-1 DK63030NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK050694NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK058964NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK050694
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) and enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) are related intestinal pathogens that harbor highly similar pathogenicity islands known as the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE). Despite their genetic similarity, these two pathogens disrupt epithelial tight junction barrier function with distinct kinetics. EHEC-induced reduction in transepithelial electrical resistance (TER), a measure of barrier function disruption, is significantly slower and more modest in comparison to that induced by EPEC. The variation in bacterial adherence only partially accounted for these differences. The LEE-encoded effector protein EspF has been shown to be critical for EPEC-induced alterations in TER. EspF from both EPEC and EHEC is expressed and secreted upon growth in tissue culture medium. The mutation of EHEC cesF suggested that the optimal expression and secretion of EHEC EspF required its chaperone CesF, as has been shown for EPEC. In contrast to EPEC espF and cesF, mutation of the corresponding EHEC homologs did not dramatically alter the decrease in TER. These differences could possibly be explained by the presence of additional espF-like sequences (designated U- and M-espF, where the letter designations refer to the specific cryptic prophage sequences on the EHEC chromosome closest to the respective genes) in EHEC. Reverse transcription-PCR analyses revealed coordinate regulation of EHEC U-espF and the LEE-encoded espF, with enhanced expression in bacteria grown in Dulbecco-Vogt modified Eagle's medium compared to bacteria grown in Luria broth. Both EHEC espF and U-espF complemented an EPEC espF deletion strain for barrier function alteration. The overexpression of U-espF, but not espF, in wild-type EHEC potentiated the TER response. These studies reveal further similarities and differences in the pathogenesis of EPEC and EHEC.

Indexed as

Bacterial AdhesionCaco-2 CellsCell Line, TumorEpithelial CellsEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialHumansIntestinesMicroscopy, FluorescenceMolecular ChaperonesTight JunctionsVirulenceEscherichia coli ProteinsMolecular Chaperones

Identifiers

PMID15155623
PMCPMC415647
OpenAlexW2106469610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.