Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15155617›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2004

Comparative analysis of B- and T-cell epitopes of Mycobacterium leprae and Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture filtrate protein 10.

John S Spencer, Hee Jin Kim, Angela M Marques, Mercedes Gonzalez-Juarerro, Monica C B S Lima, Varalakshmi D Vissa, Richard W Truman, Maria Laura Gennaro, Sang-Nae Cho, Stewart T Cole and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

John S SpencerDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA. John.Spencer@colostate.edu
Hee Jin Kim
Angela M Marques
Mercedes Gonzalez-Juarerro
Monica C B S Lima
Varalakshmi D Vissa
Richard W Truman
Maria Laura Gennaro
Sang-Nae Cho
Stewart T Cole
Patrick J Brennan
Colorado State University · USInstitut Pasteur · FRInternational Center for Public Health · USLouisiana State University · USUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRYonsei University · KR

Funding

Leprosy Bacillus: From Genotype to Phenotype to ToolsR01AI047197 · NIAID · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY-FORT COLLINS · PI BRENNAN, PATRICK JOSEPH · 2001 to 2009
$3.2M
TUBERCULOSIS RESEARCH MATERIALS AND VACINE TESTINGN01AI075320 · NIAID · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY-FORT COLLINS · 1997 to 2004
$980k
LEPROSY RESEARCH SUPPORTN01AI055262 · NIAID · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY-FORT COLLINS · PI BRENNEN, PATRICK J · 1995 to 2000
$426k
NIAID NIH HHS AI-47197NIAID NIH HHS AI-55262NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI-75320NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI047197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Culture filtrate protein 10 (CFP-10) from Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a well-characterized immunodominant 10-kDa protein antigen known to elicit a very potent early gamma interferon response in T cells from M. tuberculosis-infected mice and humans. The sequence of the Mycobacterium leprae homologue of CFP-10 shows only 40% identity (60% homology) at the protein level with M. tuberculosis CFP-10 and thus has the potential for development as a T- or B-cell reactive antigen for specific diagnosis of leprosy. Antisera raised in mice or rabbits against recombinant M. leprae and M. tuberculosis CFP-10 proteins reacted only with homologous peptides from arrays of overlapping synthetic peptides, indicating that there was no detectable cross-reactivity at the antibody level. Sera from leprosy and tuberculosis patients were also specific for the homologous protein or peptides and showed distinct patterns of recognition for either M. leprae or M. tuberculosis CFP-10 peptides. At the cellular level, only 2 of 45 mouse T-cell hybridomas raised against either M. leprae or M. tuberculosis CFP-10 displayed a cross-reactive response against the N-terminal heterologous CFP-10 peptide, the region that exhibits the highest level of identity in the two proteins; however, the majority of peptide epitopes recognized by mouse T-cell hybridomas specific for each protein did not cross-react with heterologous peptides. Coupled with the human serology data, these results raise the possibility that peptides that could be used to differentiate infections caused by these two related microorganisms could be developed. Immunohistochemical staining of sections of M. leprae-infected nude mouse footpads resulted in strongly positive staining in macrophages and dendritic cells, as well as weaker staining in extracellular areas, suggesting that M. leprae CFP-10, like its homologue in M. tuberculosis, is a secreted protein.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsBacterial ProteinsEpitopes, B-LymphocyteEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHumansHybridomasImmune SeraLeprosyMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, NudeMolecular Sequence DataMycobacterium lepraeMycobacterium tuberculosisPeptidesBacterial ProteinsCFP-10 protein, Mycobacterium tuberculosisEpitopes, B-LymphocyteEpitopes, T-LymphocyteImmune SeraPeptidesRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15155617
PMCPMC415692
OpenAlexW2105328380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.