Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15155194›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2004

Phase 2, randomized, dose-ranging study evaluating the safety and efficacy of anidulafungin in invasive candidiasis and candidemia.

David S Krause, John Reinhardt, Jose A Vazquez, Annette Reboli, Beth P Goldstein, Michele Wible, Timothy Henkel, Anidulafungin Invasive Candidiasis Study Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01053884 (Anidulafungin in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies - An Open-label, Prospective Study to Evaluate the Safety Profile at Prophylactic and Therapeutic Dosages), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01053884 phase2terminatednot on this mapstarted 2009, after this paper: background citation

Anidulafungin in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies - An Open-label, Prospective Study to Evaluate the Safety Profile at Prophylactic and Therapeutic Dosages

TypeinterventionalSponsorElisabethinen HospitalRan2009 to 2011Enrolled10ConditionsHematologic MalignanciesArmsAnidulafungin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 178 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. A Comprehensive review of abdominal infections.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2011
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David S KrauseVicuron Pharmaceuticals Inc., 455 S. Gulph Rd., Suite 310, King of Prussia, PA 19406, USA. dkrause@vicuron.com
John Reinhardt
Jose A Vazquez
Annette Reboli
Beth P Goldstein
Michele Wible
Timothy Henkel
Anidulafungin Invasive Candidiasis Study Group
Christiana Care Health System · USWayne State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of anidulafungin, a novel echinocandin, in patients with invasive candidiasis, including candidemia. A total of 123 eligible patients were randomized to one of three intravenous regimens, 50, 75, or 100 mg once daily. Treatment continued for 2 weeks beyond resolution or improvement of signs and symptoms. The primary efficacy criterion was a successful global response rate (i.e., clinical and microbiological success) in the evaluable population at the follow-up (FU) visit, 2 weeks after end of therapy (EOT). One hundred twenty (120) patients received at least one dose of anidulafungin; 68 were evaluable. Review of adverse events and laboratory data indicated no dose response for safety parameters. Non-albicans Candida species accounted for approximately one-half of all isolates. Success rates at EOT were 84, 90, and 89% in the 50-, 75-, and 100-mg groups, respectively. At FU, the success rates were 72, 85, and 83%. Phase 3 studies of anidulafungin for the treatment of invasive candidiasis and candidemia are warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnidulafunginAntifungal AgentsAPACHECandidiasisDose-Response Relationship, DrugEchinocandinsFemaleFungemiaHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeptides, CyclicProspective StudiesAnidulafunginAntifungal AgentsEchinocandinsPeptides, Cyclic

Identifiers

PMID15155194
PMCPMC415613
OpenAlexW2123557864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.