ReviewDrug safety2004
Clinical pharmacology: special safety considerations in drug development and pharmacovigilance.
Review in Drug safety, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computer aided identification of sodium channel blockers in the clinical treatment of epilepsy using molecular docking tools.Bioinformation · 2015Article
- Pharmacokinetics of orally administered duloxetine in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2014Article
- Detection of pharmacovigilance-related adverse events using electronic health records and automated methods.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2012Article
- Adverse drug events in an intensive care unit of a university hospital.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2011Article
- Review
- Risk perception and reasons for noncompliance in pharmacovigilance: a qualitative study conducted in Canada.Drug safety · 2009Article
- Pharmaceutical research in paediatric populations and the new EU Paediatric Legislation: an industry perspective.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2008Article
- On pharmaceutical risk minimization.Drug safety · 2008Article
- Pharmacovigilance in developing countries.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2007Article
- Adverse reactions related to drugs for headache treatment: clinical impact.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2005Article
- Special population considerations and regulatory affairs for clinical research.Clinical research and regulatory affairsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The dose of a drug is a major determinant of its safety, and establishing a safe dose of a novel drug is a prime objective during clinical development. The design of pre-marketing clinical trials precludes the representation of important subpopulations such as children, the elderly and people with co-morbidities. Therefore, postmarketing surveillance (PMS) activities are required to monitor the safety profile of drugs in real clinical practice. Furthermore, individual variations in pharmacogenetic profiles, the immune system, drug metabolic pathways and drug-drug interactions are also important factors in the occurrence of adverse drug reactions. Thus, the safety of a drug is a major clinical consideration before and after it is marketed. A multidisciplinary approach is required to enhance the safety profile of drugs at all stages of development, including PMS activities. Clinical pharmacology encompasses a range of disciplines and forms the backbone of drug safety consideration during clinical drug development. In this review we give an overview of the clinical drug development process and consider its limitations. We present a discussion of several aspects of clinical pharmacology and their application to enhancing drug safety. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling provides a method of predicting a clinically safe dose; consideration of drug pharmacokinetics in special populations may enhance safe therapeutics in a wider spectrum of patients, while pharmacogenetics provides the possibility of genotype-specific therapeutics. Pharmacovigilance activities are also discussed. Given the complex nature and unpredictability of type B reactions, PMS activities are crucial in managing the risks drugs pose to the general population. The various aspects of clinical pharmacology discussed make a strong case for this field as the backbone of optimising and promoting safe development and use of drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15154826What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.