Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15151520›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2004

Population pharmacokinetics of (R)-, (S)- and rac-methadone in methadone maintenance patients.

David J R Foster, Andrew A Somogyi, Jason M White, Felix Bochner

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Pharmacogenetics of Methadone Response.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Estimated infant exposure to enantiomer-specific methadone levels in breastmilk.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David J R FosterDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia. david.foster@adelaide.edu.au
Andrew A Somogyi
Jason M White
Felix Bochner
University of Adelaide · AURoyal Adelaide Hospital · AU

Funding

PAIN ANALGESIC RESPONSE IN OPIATE DEPENDENCER01DA013706 · NIDA · FRIENDS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. · PI LING, WALTER NMN · 2001 to 2003
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS 1 R01 DA 13706-02NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo construct a population pharmacokinetic model for methadone enantiomers in the setting of methadone maintenance treatment for opioid dependence.

methodsA population pharmacokinetic model was developed using P-Pharm software for rac-, (R)- and (S)-methadone using data (8-13 plasma samples per subject) obtained from 59 methadone maintenance patients during one interdosing interval at steady state. The patients were randomly assigned to either a development (n = 38) or a validation dataset (n = 21). The model was refined by inclusion of all subjects to construct a final basic model, which was used to construct a covariate model.

resultsA population-based two-compartment open model with first-order absorption and lag time was developed and validated for all analytes. The population geometric mean (coefficient of variation) of maximum a posteriori probability Bayesian estimated values for clearance, terminal half-life and volume of distribution at steady-state of the active (R)-enantiomer were 8.7 (42%) l h(-1), 51 (45%) h and 597 (45%) l, respectively. For all analytes, the volume of the central compartment was decreased with increasing plasma alpha(1)-acid glycoprotein concentration and was lower in females, while the delay in absorption was longer at higher doses. No covariates were identified for apparent oral clearance. The apparent oral clearance of (R)-methadone (geometric mean ratio; 95% confidence interval) was 105% (99, 110), that of (S)-methadone (P = 0.19), while (R)-methadone V(c)/F (154%; 151, 157), V(dss) /F (173%; 164, 183), t(1/2beta) (162%; 153, 172) and mean residence time (166%; 156, 176) were significantly greater (P < 0.0001) than for (S)-methadone. The population pharmacokinetic models were able to predict accurately oral clearance values from limited (one or two samples) blood sampling protocols.

conclusionsThe substantial stereoselectivity in methadone disposition reinforces the potential for misinterpretation of racemic methadone disposition data. The marked interindividual variability in (R)-methadone clearance, with no covariates identified, highlights the need for alternative methods to determine an individual's metabolic clearance. The ability to predict (R)-methadone clearance from one to two blood samples at steady state may prove clinically useful if a drug-drug interaction or poor adherence are suspected and guide the prescriber in deciding if a client's request for a dose increase is warranted or whether an alternative opioid would be more appropriate.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMaleMethadoneMiddle AgedNarcoticsOpioid-Related DisordersStereoisomerismMethadoneNarcotics

Identifiers

PMID15151520
PMCPMC1884530
OpenAlexW2140660745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.