Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15150567›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of cancer2004

CYFRA 21-1 is a prognostic determinant in non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a meta-analysis in 2063 patients.

J-L Pujol, O Molinier, W Ebert, J-P Daurès, F Barlesi, G Buccheri, M Paesmans, E Quoix, D Moro-Sibilot, M Szturmowicz and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of cancer, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 197 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Molecular Biomarkers in Cholangiocarcinoma: Focus on Bile.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

J-L PujolMontpellier Academic Hospital, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, Avenue du Doyen Giraud, 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5, France. pujol@cyber-sante.org
O Molinier
W Ebert
J-P Daurès
F Barlesi
G Buccheri
M Paesmans
E Quoix
D Moro-Sibilot
M Szturmowicz
J-M Bréchot
T Muley
J Grenier
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FRAzienda Sanitaria Ospedaliera S.Croce e Carle Cuneo · ITCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRHôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve · FRHôpital Sainte-Marguerite · FRHôtel-Dieu de Paris · FRInstitut Jules Bordet · BEInstitut Universitaire de Recherche Clinique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic significance of a high pretreatment serum CYFRA 21-1 level (a cytokeratin 19 fragment) adjusted for the effects of well-known co-variables in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This meta-analysis based on individual updated data gathered comprehensive databases from published or unpublished controlled studies dealing with the prognostic effect of serum CYFRA 21-1 level at presentation in NSCLC of any stage (nine institutions, 2063 patients). Multivariate regression was carried out with the Cox model. The proportional hazard assumption for each of the selected variables retained in the final model was originally checked by log minus log plots baseline hazard ratio. The follow-up ranged from 25 to 78 months. A total of 1616 events were recorded. In the multivariate analysis performed at the 1-year end point, a high pretreatment CYFRA 21-1 level was an unfavourable prognostic determinant in all centres except one (Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 1.88 (1.64-2.15), P<10(-4)). Other significant variables were stage of the disease, age and performance status. Within the first 18 months, the procedure disclosed a nearly similar hazard ratio for patients having a high pretreatment serum CYFRA 21-1 level (1.62 (1.42-1.86), P<10(-4)). For patients who did not undergo surgery, the hazard ratio during the first year of follow-up was 1.78 (1.54-2.07), P<10(-4). Finally, in the surgically treated population, at the 2-year end point, a high pretreatment CYFRA 21-1 and a locally advanced stage remained unfavourable prognostic determinants. In conclusion CYFRA 21-1 might be regarded as a putative co-variable in analysing NSCLC outcome inasmuch as a high serum level is a significant determinant of poor prognosis whatever the planned treatment.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAgedAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHumansKeratin-19KeratinsLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPatient Care PlanningPrognosisSurvival Analysisantigen CYFRA21.1Antigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorKeratin-19Keratins

Identifiers

PMID15150567
PMCPMC2409493
OpenAlexW2045728965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.