Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15148212›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2004

Engaging families in health services research on childhood visual impairment: barriers to, and degree and nature of bias in, participation.

J S Rahi, I Manaras, H Tuomainen, G Lewando Hundt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Potential bias in ophthalmic pharmaceutical clinical trials.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2008
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J S RahiCentre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics and the Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Child Health/Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK. j.rahi@ich.ucl.ac.uk
I Manaras
H Tuomainen
G Lewando Hundt

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate the barriers to, and degree and nature of bias in, participation in health services research by parents of children with visual impairment.

methodsParents of children newly diagnosed with ophthalmic disorders at Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, participated in a study to elicit their health service experiences and needs through a postal questionnaire survey followed by in-depth interviews. The participating and non-participating families were compared at different stages of recruitment, according to sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

results20% (55) of all eligible families could not be invited to participate because of out of date contact details for either the family and/or family doctor in the hospital and/or community record systems. Completed questionnaires were received from 67% (147/221) of contacted families, although only 6% actively declined to take part. Compared to non-participating parents, those who took part were more likely to be white British, from higher socioeconomic groups, have English as their main language, and have no other visually impaired family members. There were no significant differences according to the clinical characteristics of their affected children.

conclusionsFamilies from socioeconomically deprived and ethnic minority groups are likely to be less visible than others in health services research on childhood visual impairment. Geographical mobility in families of young children with visual disability poses a potentially important obstacle to engaging them in research on their experiences of health services. These findings indicate the importance of addressing potential biases in the design and interpretation of future studies, to ensure equity in recommendations for policy and practice, and in implementation of services.

Indexed as

Health Services ResearchParentsPatient ParticipationVision DisordersAdultChildHumansSelection BiasSocial ClassWhite People

Identifiers

PMID15148212
PMCPMC1772196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.