Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15147585›Full record

SynthesisBMC family practice2004

Topical NSAIDs for acute pain: a meta-analysis.

Lorna Mason, R Andrew Moore, Jayne E Edwards, Sheena Derry, Henry J McQuay

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC family practice, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00471393 (Double-blind Randomized Clinical Study on Topical Diclofenac Efficacy in Symptomatic Relief of Temporomandibular Degenerative Joint Disease in Women.), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00471393 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2006, after this paper: background citation

Double-blind Randomized Clinical Study on Topical Diclofenac Efficacy in Symptomatic Relief of Temporomandibular Degenerative Joint Disease in Women.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AlbertaRan2006 to 2007Enrolled28ConditionsTemporomandibular Degenerative Joint DiseaseArms1.5% diclofenac in 45.5% DMSO (topical treatment), 45.5% DMSO (topical placebo)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Topical NSAIDs for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Topical NSAIDs for acute musculoskeletal pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Topical NSAIDs for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. NSAIDs.BMJ clinical evidence · 2010
    Pooled it
  6. Topical NSAIDs for acute pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. NSAIDs.BMJ clinical evidence · 2007
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Analgesic effects of indomethacin spray on drug-induced oral mucositis pain in patients with cancer: A single-arm cross-sectional study.Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry · 2021
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lorna MasonPain Research and Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, University of Oxford, Oxford Radcliffe Hospital, The Churchill, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LJ, UK. lorna.mason79@yahoo.com
R Andrew Moore
Jayne E Edwards
Sheena Derry
Henry J McQuay

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA previous systematic review reported that topical NSAIDs were effective in relieving pain in acute conditions like sprains and strains, with differences between individual drugs for efficacy. More trials, a better understanding of trial quality and bias, and a reclassification of certain drugs necessitate a new review.

methodsStudies were identified by searching electronic databases and writing to manufacturers. We selected randomised double blind trials comparing topical NSAID with either placebo or another active treatment in adults with acute pain, and extracted dichotomous information approximating to a 50% reduction in pain at one week, together with details of adverse events and withdrawals. Relative benefit and number-needed-to-treat (NNT), and relative risk and number-needed-to-harm (NNH) were calculated, with sensitivity analyses where appropriate to investigate differences between individual drugs and aspects of trial design.

resultsTwenty-six double blind placebo controlled trials had information from 2,853 patients for evaluation of efficacy. Topical NSAID was significantly better than placebo in 19 of the 26 trials, with a pooled relative benefit of 1.6 (95% confidence interval 1.4 to 1.7), and NNT of 3.8 (95% confidence interval 3.4 to 4.4) compared with placebo for the outcome of half pain relief at seven days. Results were not affected by outcome reported, or condition treated, but smaller trials yielded a larger estimate of efficacy. Indirect comparisons of individual topical NSAIDs showed that ketoprofen was significantly better than all other topical NSAIDs, while indomethacin was barely distinguished from placebo. Three trials, with 433 patients, compared topical with oral NSAID (two trials compared the same drug, one compared different drugs) and found no difference in efficacy. Local adverse events, systemic adverse events, or withdrawals due to an adverse event were rare, and no different between topical NSAID and placebo.

conclusionsTopical NSAIDs were effective and safe in treating acute painful conditions for one week.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdministration, TopicalAdultAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDouble-Blind MethodHumansKetoprofenPainPain MeasurementPlacebosRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalKetoprofenPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID15147585
PMCPMC420463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.