Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15147582›Full record

ArticleBMC physiology2004

Differential expression of E-cadherin, N-cadherin and beta-catenin in proximal and distal segments of the rat nephron.

Walter C Prozialeck, Peter C Lamar, Denah M Appelt

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC physiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Retinoic acid receptor α activity in proximal tubules prevents kidney injury and fibrosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Absence of E-Cadherin and β-Catenin in the Basal Plasma Membrane of Collecting Duct Cells During NDI Development and Recovery.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Walter C ProzialeckDepartment of Pharmacology, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL 60515, USA. wprozi@midwestern.edu
Peter C Lamar
Denah M Appelt
Midwestern University · USPhiladelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine · US

Funding

MECHANISMS OF CADMIUM TOXICITY IN EPITHELIAL CELLSR01ES006478 · NIEHS · MIDWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI PROZIALECK, WALTER C · 1994 to 2007
$1.4M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES006478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe classical cadherins such as E- and N-cadherin are Ca2+-dependent cell adhesion molecules that play important roles in the development and maintenance of renal epithelial polarity. Recent studies have shown that a variety of cadherins are present in the kidney and are differentially expressed in various segments of the nephron. However, the interpretation of these findings has been complicated by the fact that the various studies focused on different panels of cadherins and utilized different species. Moreover, since only a few of the previous studies focused on the rat, information regarding the expression and localization of renal cadherins in this important species is lacking. In the present study, we have employed dual immunofluorescent labeling procedures that utilized specific antibodies against either E- or N-cadherin, along with antibodies that target markers for specific nephron segments, to characterize the patterns of cadherin expression in frozen sections of adult rat kidney.

resultsThe results showed that N-cadherin is the predominant cadherin in the proximal tubule, but is essentially absent in other nephron segments. By contrast, E-cadherin is abundant in the distal tubule, collecting duct and most medullary segments, but is present only at very low levels in the proximal tubule. Additional results revealed different patterns of N-cadherin labeling along various segments of the proximal tubule. The S1 and S2 segments exhibit a fine threadlike pattern of labeling at the apical cell surface, whereas the S3 segment show intense labeling at the lateral cell-cell contacts.

conclusionsThese results indicate that E- and N-cadherin are differentially expressed in the proximal and distal tubules of rat kidney and they raise the possibility that differences in cadherin expression and localization may contribute to the differences in the susceptibility of various nephron segments to renal pathology or nephrotoxic injury.

Indexed as

AnimalsAquaporin 1Aquaporin 2Aquaporinsbeta CateninCadherinsCytoskeletal ProteinsFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectGene Expression RegulationKidney Tubules, CollectingKidney Tubules, DistalKidney Tubules, ProximalMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTrans-ActivatorsAqp1 protein, ratAqp2 protein, ratAquaporin 1Aquaporin 2Aquaporinsbeta CateninCadherinsCtnnb1 protein, ratCytoskeletal ProteinsTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID15147582
PMCPMC459230
OpenAlexW1835009115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.