ReviewEndocrine
Therapy of erectile dysfunction: potential future treatments.
Review in Endocrine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contemporary Management Strategies for Peyronie's Disease: A Comprehensive Review.Research and reports in urology · 2026Review
- Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis of Stem Cell Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Article
- PEYRONIE'S DISEASE: A REVIEW OF ETIOLOGY, DIAGNOSIS, AND MANAGEMENT.Current sexual health reports · 2015Article
- Rho-kinase inhibition: a novel therapeutic target for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases.Drug discovery today · 2010Review
- Reversal of voltage-dependent erectile responses in the Zucker obese-diabetic rat by rosuvastatin-altered RhoA/Rho-kinase signaling.The journal of sexual medicine · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Current research on the development of new medical treatments of erectile dysfunction (ED) fall essentially into two main types of approaches: (1) the traditional strategy based on compounds acting to induce an erection on demand, without modifying the underlying pathologic alterations that lead to ED; and (2) more novel agents not inducing an erectile response but aiming for a long-term correction of either the defect in cavernosal tissue integrity responsible for functional impairment, or the impairment per se of the cavernosal tissue function. In the first approach, new phosphodiesterase inhibitors (either more potent and specific than the clinically available ones or harboring nitric oxide-releasing structures), soluble guanylate cyclase activators, Rho kinase inhibitors, as well as centrally active agents stimulating hypothalamic dopamine or melanocortin receptors, combinations of different types of drugs, and new facilitators of tissue uptake of active agents, are being investigated and some may soon be applied clinically. In the second approach, the first type of correction comprises regulators of endogenous cell number and integrity and extracellular matrix turnover (inhibitors of apoptosis and fibrosis, neurotrophic and angiogenic factors), testosterone, and tissue and cell explants (nerve and smooth muscle grafting, adult pluripotent cells), whereas the second includes in vivo gene therapy with different genes and vectors, and ex vivo gene therapy, combining gene transfer with stem cell implants. This second approach requires extensive laboratory research prior to clinical translation but may provide a means to cure ED. The current status and future directions of these strategies are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.