Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15144231›Full record

ReviewDrug safety2004

Cancer risk following growth hormone use in childhood: implications for current practice.

Amanda L Ogilvy-Stuart, Helena Gleeson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Bioactive IGF-I Concentrations in Children on GH Therapy.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Growth hormone treatment and risk of malignancy.Korean journal of pediatrics · 2015
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Cancer risk in patients with Noonan syndrome carrying a PTPN11 mutation.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2011
    Article
  12. Leg length, body proportion, and health: a review with a note on beauty.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2010
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda L Ogilvy-StuartDepartment of Paediatrics, Addenbrooke's NHS Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom. amanda.ogilvy_stuart@addenbrookes.nhs.uk
Helena Gleeson
Addenbrooke's Hospital · GBThe Christie Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The therapeutic use of growth hormone (GH) has caused concern, as it is anabolic and mitogenic, and its effector hormone, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I is anti-apoptotic. As both hormones can cause proliferation of normal and malignant cells, the possibility that GH therapy may induce cancer, increase the risk of tumour recurrence in those previously treated for a malignancy, or increase the risk of cancer in those with a predisposition, has resulted in concerns over its use. There are theoretical and epidemiological reasons that suggest GH and IGF-I may be important in tumour formation and proliferation. Malignant tumours have been induced in animals exposed to supraphysiological doses of GH, whereas hypophysectomy appears to protect animals from carcinogen-induced neoplasms. In vitro, proliferation and transformation of normal haemopoetic and leukaemic cells occurs with supraphysiological doses of GH, but not with physiological levels. IGF, IGF binding proteins (IGFBP) and IGFBP proteases influence the proliferation of cancer cells in vitro; however, GH is probably not involved in this process. Epidemiological studies have suggested an association between levels of IGF-I and cancer, and an inverse relationship between IGFBP-3 and cancer; however, these associations have been inconsistent. A number of studies have been undertaken to determine the risk of the development of cancer in children treated with GH, either de novo, or the recurrence of cancer in those previously treated for a malignancy. Despite early concerns following a report of a cluster of cases of leukaemia in recipients of GH, there appears to be no increased risk for the development of leukaemia in those treated with GH unless there is an underlying predisposition. Even in children with a primary diagnosis of cancer, subsequent GH use does not appear to increase the risk of tumour recurrence. However, a recent follow-up of pituitary GH recipients has suggested an increase in colorectal cancer. In addition, follow-up of oncology patients has suggested an increase in second neoplasms in those who also received GH therapy. These studies emphasise the importance of continued surveillance both internationally with established databases and also nationally through single-centre studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain NeoplasmsCell DivisionChildDisease Models, AnimalGrowth DisordersGrowth HormoneHuman Growth HormoneHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3Insulin-Like Growth Factor ILeukemiaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasmsRisk FactorsGrowth HormoneHuman Growth HormoneInsulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3Insulin-Like Growth Factor I

Identifiers

PMID15144231
OpenAlexW116718185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.