Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15142931›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2004

HINARI: bridging the global information divide.

Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neurosurgical challenges of open access publishing in LMICs.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Building capacity in a health sciences library to support global health projects.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2014
    Article
  7. Technology for development: innovation is not enough.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2011
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Rising expectations: access to biomedical information.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2008
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Open access: implications for scholarly publishing and medical libraries.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2006
    Review
  14. Open access publishing: too much oxygen?BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Srinivasa Vittal KatikireddiUniversity of Edinburgh, Liverpool L18 9XN. vkatikireddi@yahoo.co.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesForecastingInternational CooperationInternetMedical InformaticsPeriodicals as TopicWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID15142931
PMCPMC411106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.