ReviewDrug safety2004
Do some inhibitors of COX-2 increase the risk of thromboembolic events?: Linking pharmacology with pharmacoepidemiology.
Review in Drug safety, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- A randomized controlled trial of celecoxib to prevent recurrence of nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2011Trial
- MTA1 Regulates EMT and BRAF Signaling Networks in Canine Urothelial Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of cerebrovascular events in patients with osteoarthritis: a nested case-control study.Internal and emergency medicine · 2016Article
- Cyclooxygenase-1 and -2: molecular targets for cervical neoplasia.Journal of cancer prevention · 2013Review
- Pharmacogenomic technologies: a necessary "luxury" for better global public health?Globalization and health · 2011Article
- Was the thrombotic risk of rofecoxib predictable from the French Pharmacovigilance Database before 30 September 2004?European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2008Article
- Selective COX-2 inhibitors, NSAIDs and cardiovascular events - is celecoxib the safest choice?Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2007Article
- Perioperative pain management.CNS drugs · 2007Review
- COX-2 inhibitors and the heart: are all coxibs the same?Postgraduate medical journal · 2006Review
- Etoricoxib for arthritis and pain management.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2006Article
- Temporal relationship between use of NSAIDs, including selective COX-2 inhibitors, and cardiovascular risk.Drug safety · 2006Article
- Molecular medicine: promises, promises?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2005Review
- The influence of big pharma.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005Article
- Do selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors have a future?Drug safety · 2005Article
- A comparison of reported gastrointestinal and thromboembolic events between rofecoxib and celecoxib using observational data.Drug safety · 2005Article
- Article
- Coxibs: can this class of drugs survive?Vascular health and risk management · 2005Article
- Cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors: when should they be used in the elderly?Drugs & aging · 2005Review
- Safety profile of celecoxib as used in general practice in England: results of a prescription-event monitoring study.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2004Article
- Linking pharmacovigilance with pharmacogenetics.Drug safety · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inhibitors of the cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 isoenzyme were developed with the expectation that their use would be accompanied by a reduction in adverse reactions thought to be mediated through COX-1 compared with conventional nonselective NSAIDs. However, the results of some clinical studies and other evidence have led to the hypothesis that use of COX-2 inhibitors may contribute to an increased risk of adverse thromboembolic (TE) events. In this review, we have evaluated the evidence from small-scale in vitro and in vivo pharmacological studies, clinical trials and large-scale pharmacoepidemiological studies and commented on the relationship between the pharmacological characteristics related to thromboembolic events and the clinical effects in large-scale clinical trials and pharmacoepidemiological studies. Overall, the pharmacological evidence suggests that a prothrombotic effect of COX-2 selective inhibitors is plausible. To date, despite the results from the Vioxx Gastrointestinal Outcome Research (VIGOR) study from which the clinical concern regarding cardiovascular TE risk arose, the published data from other randomised controlled trials (RCTs), retrospective observational studies and spontaneous reporting schemes provide a conflicting body of evidence on the TE risk with COX-2 inhibitors. Concerns that COX-2 inhibitors may be associated with prothrombotic effects remain and these need to be addressed in large scale, RCTs designed specifically to investigate the possibility of an excess of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in users of some or all selective COX-2 inhibitors, both with and without concomitant low-dose aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid). Consideration must also be given to other pathophysiological mechanisms for potential cardiovascular risk linked with inhibition of COX-2. In view of the evidence reviewed, it is recommended that selective COX-2 inhibitors should be prescribed with caution, only in patients with conditions for which these drugs have proven efficacy and with careful monitoring of outcomes and adverse events. This is particularly important in the elderly, in patients with cardiovascular/renal disease and in patients with other risk factors that might predispose them to adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.