Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15141995›Full record

ReviewDrug safety2004

Do some inhibitors of COX-2 increase the risk of thromboembolic events?: Linking pharmacology with pharmacoepidemiology.

David W J Clark, Deborah Layton, Saad A W Shakir

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Etoricoxib for arthritis and pain management.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2006
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Molecular medicine: promises, promises?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2005
    Review
  13. The influence of big pharma.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Coxibs: can this class of drugs survive?Vascular health and risk management · 2005
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David W J ClarkNew Zealand Pharmacovigilance Centre, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, School of Medicine & Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. david.clark@stonebow.otago.ac.nz
Deborah Layton
Saad A W Shakir
University of Portsmouth · GBUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhibitors of the cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 isoenzyme were developed with the expectation that their use would be accompanied by a reduction in adverse reactions thought to be mediated through COX-1 compared with conventional nonselective NSAIDs. However, the results of some clinical studies and other evidence have led to the hypothesis that use of COX-2 inhibitors may contribute to an increased risk of adverse thromboembolic (TE) events. In this review, we have evaluated the evidence from small-scale in vitro and in vivo pharmacological studies, clinical trials and large-scale pharmacoepidemiological studies and commented on the relationship between the pharmacological characteristics related to thromboembolic events and the clinical effects in large-scale clinical trials and pharmacoepidemiological studies. Overall, the pharmacological evidence suggests that a prothrombotic effect of COX-2 selective inhibitors is plausible. To date, despite the results from the Vioxx Gastrointestinal Outcome Research (VIGOR) study from which the clinical concern regarding cardiovascular TE risk arose, the published data from other randomised controlled trials (RCTs), retrospective observational studies and spontaneous reporting schemes provide a conflicting body of evidence on the TE risk with COX-2 inhibitors. Concerns that COX-2 inhibitors may be associated with prothrombotic effects remain and these need to be addressed in large scale, RCTs designed specifically to investigate the possibility of an excess of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in users of some or all selective COX-2 inhibitors, both with and without concomitant low-dose aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid). Consideration must also be given to other pathophysiological mechanisms for potential cardiovascular risk linked with inhibition of COX-2. In view of the evidence reviewed, it is recommended that selective COX-2 inhibitors should be prescribed with caution, only in patients with conditions for which these drugs have proven efficacy and with careful monitoring of outcomes and adverse events. This is particularly important in the elderly, in patients with cardiovascular/renal disease and in patients with other risk factors that might predispose them to adverse events.

Indexed as

CelecoxibCyclooxygenase 2Cyclooxygenase 2 InhibitorsCyclooxygenase InhibitorsHumansIsoenzymesLactonesMembrane ProteinsProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingProstaglandin-Endoperoxide SynthasesPyrazolesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSulfonamidesSulfonesThromboembolismCelecoxibCyclooxygenase 2Cyclooxygenase 2 InhibitorsCyclooxygenase InhibitorsIsoenzymesLactonesMembrane ProteinsProstaglandin-Endoperoxide SynthasesPTGS2 protein, humanPyrazolesrofecoxibSulfonamidesSulfones

Identifiers

PMID15141995
OpenAlexW1006984294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.