Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15141301›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2004

Phylogenetic origin of LI-cadherin revealed by protein and gene structure analysis.

R Jung, M W Wendeler, M Danevad, H Himmelbauer, R Gessner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cadherin 17 and digestive cancers: from diagnostic to therapeutic opportunities.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Crystal structure of the nonclassical cadherin-17 N-terminus and implications for its adhesive binding mechanism.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R JungInstitute of Laboratory Medicine and Biochemistry, Virchow-Hospital of Charité Medical School, Humboldt University of Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
M W Wendeler
M Danevad
H Himmelbauer
R Gessner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intestine specific LI-cadherin differs in its overall structure from classical and desmosomal cadherins by the presence of seven instead of five cadherin repeats and a short cytoplasmic domain. Despite the low sequence similarity, a comparative protein structure analysis revealed that LI-cadherin may have originated from a five-repeat predecessor cadherin by a duplication of the first two aminoterminal repeats. To test this hypothesis, we cloned the murine LI-cadherin gene and compared its structure to that of other cadherins. The intron-exon organization, including the intron positions and phases, is perfectly conserved between repeats 3-7 of LI-cadherin and 1-5 of classical cadherins. Moreover, the genomic structure of the repeats 1-2 and 3-4 is identical for LI-cadherin and highly similar to that of the repeats 1-2 of classical cadherins. These findings strengthen our assumption that LI-cadherin originated from an ancestral cadherin with five domains by a partial gene duplication event.

Indexed as

Membrane Transport ProteinsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBase SequenceBlotting, NorthernCadherinsCarrier ProteinsCloning, MolecularCytoplasmDNA, ComplementaryDNA PrimersExonsIntestinal MucosaIntronsMiceMolecular Sequence DataCadherinsCarrier ProteinsCdh17 protein, mouseCdh17 protein, ratDNA, ComplementaryDNA Primersintestinal peptide-proton cotransporterMembrane Transport Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15141301
PMCPMC11138757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.