Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15141270›Full record

Trial reportJournal of human hypertension2004

Influence of the presence of doctors-in-training on the blood pressure of patients: a randomised controlled trial in 22 teaching practices.

J Matthys, M De Meyere, I Mervielde, J A Knottnerus, E Den Hond, J A Staessen, D Duprez, J De Maeseneer

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of human hypertension, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. In general practice, doctors record higher blood pressures in the presence of students.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Is there a need to redo many of the diagnoses of hypertension?Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2012
    Article
  5. Patients' ideas, concerns, and expectations (ICE) in general practice: impact on prescribing.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

J MatthysDepartment of General Practice and Primary Health Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. matthys.jan@pandora.be
M De Meyere
I Mervielde
J A Knottnerus
E Den Hond
J A Staessen
D Duprez
J De Maeseneer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Until now, no information is available about the effect of the presence of a doctor-in-training on a patient's blood pressure. We tested the hypothesis that the presence of a last year medical student might increase the blood pressure of the patient, in addition to the possible pressor response to the doctor-trainer. Normotensive and hypertensive patients with a minimum age of 25 years, visiting for any reason, were recruited at 22 teaching general practices. Patients were randomised into a 'trainee' group (n=133) and a 'no trainee' (n=129) group. The blood pressure was measured at two subsequent contacts. In the 'trainee' group, a student was present at the first visit only. In the 'no trainee' group, both visits were without student. Both groups had similar anthropometric characteristics at entry. At the first visit, systolic pressure was higher in the 'trainee' group than in the control group (139.5 vs 133.1 mmHg, P=0.004), with a similar trend for diastolic pressure (80.2 vs 77.8 mmHg, P=0.07). From the first contact to the follow-up visit, blood pressure decreased in the trainee group by 4.8 mmHg systolic (P<0.001) and 1.7 mmHg diastolic (P=0.03), whereas the corresponding changes in the control group were -0.1 mmHg (P=0.90) and +1.5 mmHg (P=0.03). Thus, the between group differences in these trends averaging 4.7 mmHg (CI 1.5-7.9, P=0.005) systolic and 3.2 mmHg (CI 1.1-5.3, P=0.003) diastolic were statistically significant. We conclude that in teaching-practices, the presence of a doctor-in-training has a significant pressor effect when an experienced general practitioner measures a patient's blood pressure. If confirmed, our findings imply that doctors should be cautious to initiate or adjust antihypertensive treatment when blood pressure readings are obtained in the presence of a student.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceStudents, MedicalAdultBlood Pressure DeterminationChi-Square DistributionFamily PracticeFemaleHumansHypertensionLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedStatistics, Nonparametric

Identifiers

PMID15141270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.