Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15133850›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2004

Differential expression of cholangiocyte and ileal bile acid transporters following bile acid supplementation and depletion.

N-Sertac Kip, Konstantinos-N Lazaridis, Anatoliy-I Masyuk, Patrick-L Splinter, Robert-C Huebert, Nicholas-F LaRusso

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Bile Acid Toxicity and Protein Kinases.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Physiology of cholangiocytes.Comprehensive Physiology · 2013
    Review
  5. Bile acids inhibit duodenal secretin expression via orphan nuclear receptor small heterodimer partner (SHP).American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2009
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N-Sertac KipCenter for Basic Research in Digestive Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Konstantinos-N Lazaridis
Anatoliy-I Masyuk
Patrick-L Splinter
Robert-C Huebert
Nicholas-F LaRusso
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimWe have previously demonstrated that cholangiocytes, the epithelial cells lining intrahepatic bile ducts, encode two functional bile acid transporters via alternative splicing of a single gene to facilitate bile acid vectorial transport. Cholangiocytes possess ASBT, an apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter to take up bile acids, and t-ASBT, a basolateral alternatively spliced and truncated form of ASBT to efflux bile acids. Though hepatocyte and ileal bile acid transporters are in part regulated by the flux of bile acids, the effect of alterations in bile acid flux on the expression of t-ASBT in terminal ileocytes remains unclear. Thus, we tested the hypothesis that expression of ASBT and t-ASBT in cholangiocytes and ileocytes was regulated by bile acid flux.

methodsExpression of ASBT and t-ASBT message and protein in cholangiocytes and ileocytes isolated from pair-fed rats given control (C) and 1% taurocholate (TCA) or 5% cholestyramine (CY) enriched diets, were assessed by both quantitative RNase protection assays and quantitative immunoblotting. The data obtained from each of the control groups were pooled to reflect the changes observed following TCA and CY treatments with respect to the control diets. Cholangiocyte taurocholate uptake was determined using a novel microperfusion technique on intrahepatic bile duct units (IBDUs) derived from C, TCA and CY fed rats.

resultsIn cholangiocytes, both ASBT and t-ASBT message RNA and protein were significantly decreased in response to TCA feeding compared to C diet. In contrast, message and protein of both bile acid transporters significantly increased following CY feeding compared to C diet. In the ileum, TCA feeding significantly up-regulated both ASBT and t-ASBT message and protein compared to C diet, while CY feeding significantly down-regulated message and protein of both bile acid transporters compared to C diet. As anticipated from alterations in cholangiocyte ASBT expression, the uptake of taurocholate in microperfused IBDUs derived from rats on TCA diet decreased 2.7-fold, whereas it increased 1.7-fold in those on CY diet compared to C diet fed groups.

conclusionThese data demonstrate that expression of ASBT and t-ASBT in cholangiocytes is regulated by a negative feedback loop while the expression of these transporters in terminal ileum is modified via positive feedback. Thus, while transcriptional regulatory mechanisms in response to alterations in bile acid pool size are operative in both cholangiocytes and ileocytes, each cell type responds differently to bile acid supplementation and depletion.

Indexed as

Cholestyramine ResinIleumTaurocholic AcidAlternative SplicingAnimalsBile DuctsDietEatingEpithelial CellsGene Expression RegulationMaleOrganic Anion Transporters, Sodium-DependentProtein IsoformsRatsRats, Inbred F344SymportersCholestyramine ResinOrganic Anion Transporters, Sodium-DependentProtein Isoformssodium-bile acid cotransporterSymportersTaurocholic Acid

Identifiers

PMID15133850
PMCPMC4656281
OpenAlexW2419047028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.