ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2004
Collaborative study of the NCCLS and flow cytometry methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida albicans.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Two promising natural lipopeptides fromActa biochimica Polonica · 2024Article
- Rapid Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts and Molds by MALDI-TOF MS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Can We Improve Antifungal Susceptibility Testing?Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021Review
- Antifungal Susceptibility Testing: Current Approaches.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2020Review
- Recent trends in molecular diagnostics of yeast infections: from PCR to NGS.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2019Review
- Evaluation of synergistic anticandidal and apoptotic effects of ferulic acid and caspofungin against Candida albicans.Journal of food and drug analysis · 2018Article
- Next-generation antimicrobial susceptibility testing.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2013Review
- Novel method for evaluating in vitro activity of anidulafungin in combination with amphotericin B or azoles.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2012Article
- Susceptibility tests of oropharyngeal Candida albicans from egyptian patients to fluconazole determined by three methods.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2012Article
- Comparison of two probes for testing susceptibilities of pathogenic yeasts to voriconazole, itraconazole, and caspofungin by flow cytometry.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2005Article
- Flow cytometry susceptibility testing for the antifungal caspofungin.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One hundred clinical isolates of Candida albicans were tested for amphotericin B and fluconazole susceptibilities by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) broth microdilution test at center 1 (C1). The same isolates were tested blinded at center 2 (C2) by NCCLS and flow cytometry (FC) methods. The agreement between NCCLS and FC methods ranged from 96 to 99%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.