Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15131188›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2004

Systematic 16S rRNA gene sequencing of atypical clinical isolates identified 27 new bacterial species associated with humans.

M Drancourt, P Berger, D Raoult

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. RSC advances · 2024
    Article
  6. The first case of urosepsis caused byFuture microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Culturomics Approach to Identify Diabetic Foot Infection Bacteria.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Proof of Concept of Culturomics Use of Time of Care.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M DrancourtAssistance Publique-Hopitaux de Marseille, Timone, Fédération de Microbiologie Clinique, et Unité des Rickettsies, CNRS UMR 6020, IFR48, Faculté de Médecine, Université de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France.
P Berger
D Raoult

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical microorganisms isolated during a 5-year study in our hospital that could not be identified by conventional criteria were studied by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. Each isolate yielded a > or =1,400-bp sequence containing <5 ambiguities which was compared with the GenBank 16S rRNA gene library; 1,404 such isolates were tested, and 120 were considered unique (27 isolates) or rare (< or =10 cases reported in the literature) human pathogens. Eleven new species, "Actinobaculum massiliae," "Candidatus Actinobaculum timonae," Paenibacillus sanguinis, "Candidatus Bacteroides massiliae," Chryseobacterium massiliae, "Candidatus Chryseobacterium timonae," Paenibacillus massiliensis, "Candidatus Peptostreptococcus massiliae," "Candidatus Prevotella massiliensis," Rhodobacter massiliensis, and "Candidatus Veillonella atypica" were identified. Sixteen species were obtained from humans for the first time. Our results show the important role that 16S rRNA gene sequence-based bacterial identification currently plays in recognizing unusual and emerging bacterial diseases.

Indexed as

Genes, BacterialAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBacteriaBacteria, AnaerobicBacterial InfectionsBacterial Typing TechniquesChild, PreschoolFemaleGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive CocciGram-Positive RodsHumansInfant, NewbornRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID15131188
PMCPMC404640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.