Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15131156›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2004

Performance assessment of DNA fragment sizing by high-sensitivity flow cytometry and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

Matthew M Ferris, Xiaomei Yan, Robbert C Habbersett, Yulin Shou, Cheryl L Lemanski, James H Jett, Thomas M Yoshida, Babetta L Marrone

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cloning and sequencing analysis of wholeFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew M FerrisBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA.
Xiaomei Yan
Robbert C Habbersett
Yulin Shou
Cheryl L Lemanski
James H Jett
Thomas M Yoshida
Babetta L Marrone
Los Alamos National Laboratory · US

Funding

WORKSHOP AT INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR ANALYTICAL CYTOLOGYP41RR001315 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LOS ALAMOS NAT LAB · PI DOORN, JONATHAN A · 1985 to 2011
$19.2M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR001315NCRR NIH HHS RR-01315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sizing of restriction fragments is the chief analytical technique utilized in the production of DNA fingerprints. Few techniques have been able to compete with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), which is capable of discriminating among bacteria at species and strain levels by resolving restriction fragments. However, an ultrasensitive flow cytometer (FCM) developed in our lab has also demonstrated the ability to discriminate bacteria at species and strain levels. The abilities of FCM warrant a quantitative parallel comparison with PFGE to assess and evaluate the accuracy and precision of DNA fragment sizing by both techniques. Replicate samples of Staphylococcus aureus Mu50 were analyzed along with two clinical S. aureus isolates. The absolute fragment sizing accuracy was determined for PFGE (5% +/- 2%) and FCM (4% +/- 4%), with sequence-predicted Mu50 SmaI fragment sizes used as a reference. Precision was determined by simple arithmetic methods (relative standard deviation for PFGE [RSD(PFGE) ] = 3% +/- 2% and RSD(FCM) = 1.2% +/- 0.8%) as well as by the use of dendrograms derived from Dice coefficient-unweighted pair group method with arithmetic averages (UPGMA) and Pearson-UPGMA analyses. All quantitative measures of PFGE and FCM precision were equivalent, within error. The precision of both methods was not limited by any single sample preparation or analysis step that was tracked in this study. Additionally, we determined that the curve-based clustering of fingerprint data provided a more informative and useful assessment than did traditional band-based methods.

Indexed as

Bacteriological TechniquesDNA, BacterialDNA FingerprintingElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldFlow CytometryMolecular WeightStaphylococcus aureusDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID15131156
PMCPMC404634
OpenAlexW2129711728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.