ReviewApplied bioinformatics2002
Genomic biodiversity, phylogenetics and coevolution in proteins.
Review in Applied bioinformatics, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving the thermostability of alpha-amylase by combinatorial coevolving-site saturation mutagenesis.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
- Compensatory mutations are repeatable and clustered within proteins.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2009Article
- The Transporter Classification Database: recent advances.Nucleic acids research · 2009Article
- Bioinformatic analyses of transmembrane transport: novel software for deducing protein phylogeny, topology, and evolution.Journal of molecular microbiology and biotechnology · 2009Review
- Structural conservation of a short, functional, peptide-sequence motif.Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition) · 2009Review
- Networks of genomic co-occurrence capture characteristics of human influenza A (H3N2) evolution.Genome research · 2008Article
- Finding coevolving amino acid residues using row and column weighting of mutual information and multi-dimensional amino acid representation.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2007Article
- EGenBio: a data management system for evolutionary genomics and biodiversity.BMC bioinformatics · 2006Article
- Divergence, recombination and retention of functionality during protein evolution.Human genomics · 2005Article
- Adapting to a changing world: RAG genomics and evolution.Human genomics · 2005Review
- Context dependence and coevolution among amino acid residues in proteins.Methods in enzymology · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Comprehensive sampling of genomic biodiversity is fast becoming a reality for some genomic regions and complete organelle genomes. Genomic biodiversity is defined as large genomic sequences from many species, and here some recent work is reviewed that demonstrates the potential benefits of genomic biodiversity for molecular evolutionary analysis and phylogenetic reconstruction. This work shows that using likelihood-based approaches, taxon addition can dramatically improve phylogenetic reconstruction. Features or dynamics of the evolutionary process are much more easily inferred with large numbers of taxa, and large numbers are essential for discriminating differences in evolutionary patterns between sites. Accurate prediction of site-specific patterns can improve phylogenetic reconstruction by an amount equivalent to quadrupling sequence length. Genomic biodiversity is particularly central to research relating patterns of evolution, adaptation and coevolution to structural and functional features of proteins. Research on detecting coevolution between amino acid residues in proteins demonstrates a clear need for much greater numbers of closely related taxa to better discriminate site-specific patterns of interaction, and to allow more detailed analysis of coevolutionary interactions between subunits in protein complexes. It is argued that parsing out coevolutionary and other context-dependent substitution probabilities is essential for discriminating between coevolution and adaptation, and for more realistically modelling the evolution of proteins. Also reviewed is research that argues for increasing the efficiency of acquiring genomic biodiversity, and suggests that this might be done by simultaneously shotgun cloning and sequencing genomic mixtures from many species. Increased efficiency is a prerequisite if genomic biodiversity levels are to rapidly increase by orders of magnitude, and thus lead to dramatically improved understanding of interactions between protein structure, function and sequence evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15130847PMC2943949What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.