Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15129818›Full record

ReviewJournal of endocrinological investigation2004

Erectile dysfunction: expectations beyond phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibition.

A Aversa, M Pili, A Fabbri, E Spera, G Spera

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A AversaDepartment of Medical Phisiopathology, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy. antonio.aversa1@fastwebnet.it
M Pili
A Fabbri
E Spera
G Spera
Fatebenefratelli Hospital · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last few years the pathophysiological mechanisms of erection have been partially clarified, and the molecular machinery of the cellular components of the corpus cavernosum (CC) has been widely investigated. Since erection is a vascular event and the penis is a vascular organ, there must be an intact endothelium for an erection to occur. The regulation of penile tumescence inside the CC involves a balance between contracting and relaxing factors which regulate the functional state of smooth muscle cells. Recent studies have highlighted the importance of new local factors (i.e. phosphodiesterases, rho-kinases and endothelins), and pharmacological agents are available in the armamentarium of the specialist which are targeted to modulate the function of those mediators of erection. It is now well understood that male erectile dysfunction (ED) is a symptom rather than a disease; for this reason in the near future both general practitioners and specialists in internal medicine would have to interplay with sexual medicine. This review is intended to give the clinician some basic concepts of the pathophysiology of erection with relevance to the clinical practice, and to discuss the newest therapeutic approaches for those patients who do not respond to the treatment with oral inhibitors of phosphodiesterase Type 5.

Indexed as

3',5'-Cyclic-GMP PhosphodiesterasesCyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 5Erectile DysfunctionHumansMalePenile ErectionPhosphodiesterase InhibitorsPhosphoric Diester HydrolasesQuality of Life3',5'-Cyclic-GMP PhosphodiesterasesCyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 5PDE5A protein, humanPhosphodiesterase InhibitorsPhosphoric Diester Hydrolases

Identifiers

PMID15129818
OpenAlexW2020004023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.