Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15129228›Full record

ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2004

Prevention and treatment of nosocomial sepsis in the NICU.

Reese Clark, Richard Powers, Robert White, Barry Bloom, Pablo Sanchez, Daniel K Benjamin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Use of the complete blood cell count in early-onset neonatal sepsis.The Pediatric infectious disease journal · 2012
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sustained reductions in neonatal nosocomial infection rates following a comprehensive infection control intervention.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2006
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Reese ClarkPediatrix Medical Group Inc., 1301 Concord Terrace, Sunrise, FL 323325-2825, USA.
Richard Powers
Robert White
Barry Bloom
Pablo Sanchez
Daniel K Benjamin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nosocomial sepsis is a serious problem for neonates who are admitted for intensive care. It is associated with an increase in mortality, morbidity, and prolonged length of hospital stay. Thus, both the human and fiscal costs of these infections are high. Although the rate of nosocomial sepsis increases with the degree of both prematurity and low birth weight, no specific lab test has been shown to be very useful in improving our ability to predict who has a "real" blood-stream infection and, therefore, who needs to be treated with a full course of antibiotics. As a result, antibiotic use is double the rate of "proven" sepsis and we are facilitating the growth of resistant organisms in the neonatal intensive care unit. The purpose of this article is to describe simple changes in process, which when implemented, can reduce nosocomial infection rates in neonates and improve outcomes.

Indexed as

Infection ControlIntensive Care Units, NeonatalAnti-Bacterial AgentsBlood-Borne PathogensCandidiasisCross InfectionHumansHygieneImmunoglobulins, IntravenousInfant, NewbornProcess Assessment, Health CareSepsisVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsImmunoglobulins, IntravenousVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID15129228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.