Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15126396›Full record

ArticleGenetics2004

The evolution of the Drosophila sex-determination pathway.

Andrew Pomiankowski, Rolf Nöthiger, Adam Wilkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evidence for a Novel X Chromosome in Termites.Genome biology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Finishing the egg.Genetics · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Theme and variation in the evolution of insect sex determination.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Altering the sex determination pathway in Drosophila fat body modifies sex-specific stress responses.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew PomiankowskiDepartment of Biology, University College, London NW1 2HE, United Kingdom. ucbhpom@ucl.ac.uk
Rolf Nöthiger
Adam Wilkins

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The molecular complexity of the Drosophila somatic sex-determination pathway poses formidable intellectual challenges for attempts to explain its evolutionary origins. Here we present a reconstruction of how this regulatory cascade might have evolved in a step-by-step fashion. We illustrate how mutations in genes, which were already part of the pathway or were recruited as new regulators of the pathway, were favored by sexual selection acting on the discriminatory sex-determining signal. This allows us to explain the major features of the pathway, including multiple promoter sites, alternative splicing patterns, autoregulation, and stop codons. Our hypothesis is built on the available data from Drosophila and other insect species, and we point out where it is amenable to further experimental and comparative tests.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularModels, GeneticSex Determination ProcessesAlternative SplicingAnimalsCodon, TerminatorDrosophilaFemaleHomeostasisMaleMutationPromoter Regions, GeneticSelection, GeneticCodon, Terminator

Identifiers

PMID15126396
PMCPMC1470811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.