ArticleMaternal and child health journal2004
Prenatal care utilization and the implementation of prophylaxis to prevent perinatal HIV-1 transmission.
Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adequacy of prenatal care among women living with human immunodeficiency virus: a population-based study.BMC public health · 2015Article
- Prenatal screening for infectious diseases: an analysis of disparities and adherence to policy in California.Maternal and child health journal · 2009Article
- Women identified with HIV at labor and delivery: testing, disclosing and linking to care challenges.Maternal and child health journal · 2008Article
- AZT Availability in Illinois birthing hospitals: is the perinatal HIV prevention safety net in place?Maternal and child health journal · 2007Article
- The effectiveness of state and national policy on the implementation of perinatal HIV prevention interventions.American journal of public health · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo describe prenatal care utilization among women with HIV-1 in 4 US states, and to determine whether the adequacy of prenatal care utilization is associated with the implementation of prenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal HIV antiretroviral therapy (ARV).
methodsThree-hundred three women completed a prenatal interview. Prenatal, labor and delivery, and infant medical records were reviewed.
resultsThirty-nine percent of women did not receive adequate prenatal care; nearly one quarter of women did not begin care within the recommended timeframe, and approximately one-fifth of women received fewer than the recommended number of prenatal care visits from the time of entry into care until delivery. Those classified as less than adequate in terms of receipt of recommended visits were at increased risk for not receiving ARV during the prenatal care period and during labor and delivery, and were more likely to have had an infant subsequently diagnosed with HIV infection.
conclusionAlthough women with HIV require adequate prenatal care for their own health as well as to improve perinatal outcomes, many are at risk for not receiving this care. Lower adherence to prenatal care appointments is an important risk factor for not receiving full HIV prophylactic regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15125453What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.