Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15123593›Full record

ArticleGenome research2004

The otter annotation system.

Stephen M J Searle, James Gilbert, Vivek Iyer, Michele Clamp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Apollo 3: Multi-Species Genome Curation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Current transcriptomics in pig immunity research.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2015
    Review
  10. Comprehensive comparative homeobox gene annotation in human and mouse.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The GENCODE pseudogene resource.Genome biology · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
  16. The importance of identifying alternative splicing in vertebrate genome annotation.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2012
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Community gene annotation in practice.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Dalliance: interactive genome viewing on the web.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephen M J SearleThe Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, The Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK.
James Gilbert
Vivek Iyer
Michele Clamp

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the completion of the human genome sequence and genome sequence available for other vertebrate genomes, the task of manual annotation at the large genome scale has become a priority. Possibly even more important, is the requirement to curate and improve this annotation in the light of future data. For this to be possible, there is a need for tools to access and manage the annotation. Ensembl provides an excellent means for storing gene structures, genome features, and sequence, but it does not support the extra textual data necessary for manual annotation. We have extended Ensembl to create the Otter manual annotation system. This comprises a relational database schema for storing the manual annotation data, an application-programming interface (API) to access it, an extensible markup language (XML) format to allow transfer of the data, and a server to allow multiuser/multimachine access to the data. We have also written a data-adaptor plugin for the Apollo Browser/Editor to enable it to utilize an Otter server. The otter database is currently used by the Vertebrate Genome Annotation (VEGA) site (http://vega.sanger.ac.uk), which provides access to manually curated human chromosomes. Support is also being developed for using the AceDB annotation editor, FMap, via a perl wrapper called Lace. The Human and Vertebrate Annotation (HAVANA) group annotators at the Sanger center are using this to annotate human chromosomes 1 and 20.

Indexed as

SoftwareComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticGenesGenome, HumanHumansOnline Systems

Identifiers

PMID15123593
PMCPMC479127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.