Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15123587›Full record

ArticleGenome research2004

Two methods of whole-genome amplification enable accurate genotyping across a 2320-SNP linkage panel.

David L Barker, Mark S T Hansen, A Fawad Faruqi, Diane Giannola, Orlando R Irsula, Roger S Lasken, Martin Latterich, Vladimir Makarov, Arnold Oliphant, Jonathon H Pinter and 4 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. ddRAD Sequencing and DNA Barcoding.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Determination of Pleiotropic Effect of Warfarin inFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

David L BarkerIllumina, Inc., San Diego, California 92121, USA.
Mark S T Hansen
A Fawad Faruqi
Diane Giannola
Orlando R Irsula
Roger S Lasken
Martin Latterich
Vladimir Makarov
Arnold Oliphant
Jonathon H Pinter
Richard Shen
Irina Sleptsova
William Ziehler
Eric Lai

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comprehensive genome scans involving many thousands of SNP assays will require significant amounts of genomic DNA from each sample. We report two successful methods for amplifying whole-genomic DNA prior to SNP analysis, multiple displacement amplification, and OmniPlex technology. We determined the coverage of amplification by analyzing a SNP linkage marker set that contained 2320 SNP markers spread across the genome at an average distance of 2.5 cM. We observed a concordance of >99.8% in genotyping results from genomic DNA and amplified DNA, strongly indicating the ability of both methods used to amplify genomic DNA in a highly representative manner. Furthermore, we were able to achieve a SNP call rate of >98% in both genomic and amplified DNA. The combination of whole-genome amplification and comprehensive SNP linkage analysis offers new opportunities for genetic analysis in clinical trials, disease association studies, and archiving of DNA samples.

Indexed as

DNAGenetic LinkageGenome, HumanGenotypeHumansNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReproducibility of ResultsDNA

Identifiers

PMID15123587
PMCPMC479118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.